HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Populist Reform of the Democratic Party (Group) » "Conspiracy theory&q... » Reply #21

Response to merrily (Original post)

Mon Oct 12, 2015, 03:42 AM

21. “Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a Weaponized Term


Subtle and Deceptive Tactics to Discredit Truth in Media and Research


“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.

Conspiracy theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.


The CIA Coined the Term Conspiracy Theorist In 1967


Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” – short for “psychological operations” or disinformation – and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.

The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.




“CIA Document 1035-960” was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”

The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”

The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”

1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.




Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 47 replies Author Time Post
merrily Sep 2015 OP
orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #1
merrily Sep 2015 #2
orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #13
merrily Oct 2015 #41
orpupilofnature57 Oct 2015 #46
TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #3
merrily Sep 2015 #5
TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #11
merrily Sep 2015 #12
TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #16
merrily Sep 2015 #17
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #25
merrily Oct 2015 #37
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #42
merrily Oct 2015 #43
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #44
Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #4
merrily Sep 2015 #7
Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #9
merrily Sep 2015 #10
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #27
robertpaulsen Oct 2015 #22
newfie11 Sep 2015 #6
merrily Sep 2015 #8
Jim Lane Sep 2015 #14
merrily Sep 2015 #15
Jim Lane Sep 2015 #19
orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #18
historylovr Oct 2015 #20
LineReply “Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a Weaponized Term
Ichingcarpenter Oct 2015 #21
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #24
zeemike May 2016 #47
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #23
still_one Oct 2015 #26
merrily Oct 2015 #31
still_one Oct 2015 #34
merrily Oct 2015 #35
PatrickforO Oct 2015 #28
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #29
merrily Oct 2015 #32
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #36
merrily Oct 2015 #38
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #39
merrily Oct 2015 #40
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #45
Doubledee Oct 2015 #30
merrily Oct 2015 #33
Please login to view edit histories.