Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Some basic inaugural discussion about goals? [View all]demwing
(16,916 posts)18. My thoughts
You wrote:
1) Short concise statement of what we support for the betterment of this nation
Let's start with the SOP: "To discuss and debate issues, candidates, and strategies related to the promotion of progressive, populist reforms within the Democratic Party."
Modify it to add a short list of 3-5 actions:
Put a Living Wage bill on the ballot in every state
Promote progressive, populist, Dem Senate candidates in each of the 34 states with a Senate election in 2016
Propose a Constitutional Amendment to establish that corporations are not people & that money is not speech
2) How do we do this? Exp.: Reform/takeover of the Democratic Party? New Party? Movement not based on a party?
The goal of this group is the reform of the Democratic party. I don't want to forget that...but how?
Im big picture terms:
We start right here with an idea
We organize a group of members from each state
We put boots on the ground in each state
We focus relentlessly on our group goals
We network with other, like-minded groups
We don't quit
3) The Big One: What is the best approach to massively legitimize ourselves to where the Movement is The thing to talk about & to be involved in.
1. Activity
Nothing dampens the spirit like the appearance of being dusty.
2. Acknowledgment
We get a DU celebrity to talk about the PRG somewhere. (Is Will Pitt available? What about Rep Grayson?)
3. Ambition
We need to think big, and follow up one action with another. Our reach has got to extend beyond our grasp.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
#2 is very interesting. We should never use the term 'regulation' and innstead should use, say,
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#34
Every time the term 'regulation' is said, it should be met with the term 'rules', ex.:
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#45
It will be interesting to see if the Dem apparatus allows Warren to change *their* "message..."
villager
Nov 2014
#13
Interesting thought -- that you need the "character" or personality to capture the "mindshare,"
villager
Nov 2014
#16
I think existing progressive groups like the DFA or WFP are a good place to start.
Chathamization
Nov 2014
#14
A strong plank of any populist movement should be a fully educated and informed populace
cascadiance
Nov 2014
#21