Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

procon

(15,805 posts)
1. I must be missing something...
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:48 AM
May 2015

Sanders, like most Dems, has opposed this Republican scheme to privatise the post office, but he isn't taking credit for this. While he has expressed approval, at no point does he imply that he's responsible for the sudden change in the the post office decision.

The writer is Jason Easley, owner of the website, PoliticusUSA, is editorializing by implying that. Sanders doesn't need anyone to glamorize his position, his positive record stands on its own. He omits mentioning what specific actions Sanders, any other Senator for that matter, none of whom have any direct control over the USPS, did to stop the closures.

This writer didn't do Sanders any favor by writing this specious puff piece. It backfired and only makes the Senator look grasping and desperate enough for attention that he must stoop to stealing credit for someone else's work. Just tell the truth and Sanders will still shine without the misleading embellishments.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I must be missing something... procon May 2015 #1
You are missing something, and if you had read the embedded link you would be Jefferson23 May 2015 #2
Right on! TheNutcracker May 2015 #3
Yes, thank you, I read the cited link and several others as well. procon May 2015 #5
That's because, and again I will direct you to the original OP where Sanders states: Jefferson23 May 2015 #7
My comment was addressed to the writer of the article, procon May 2015 #8
Nonsense, the author did not write a misleading story. Your difficulty was in not reading the Jefferson23 May 2015 #9
Yes, thank you, I did follow the links, procon May 2015 #10
Oh for crying out loud. The author put the links in the OP, there was nothing he did that was Jefferson23 May 2015 #12
Actually, I was quite specific in my charge. procon May 2015 #19
Yea, except your charge was baseless. Have a nice day. n/t Jefferson23 May 2015 #20
There are none so blind as those who will not see. I guess it's hard to trash a candidate sabrina 1 May 2015 #21
I will listen to a gripe, sure. This was a baseless complaint, charging the author of the OP Jefferson23 May 2015 #23
+1 a whole bunch! Enthusiast May 2015 #6
Thank you for correcting the first post. I really wish people would bother to click links before sabrina 1 May 2015 #11
You're welcome, he/she is not convinced. The links are there, nonetheless. n/t Jefferson23 May 2015 #13
K&R..... daleanime May 2015 #4
What are the Republicans hoping to gain by getting rid of the USPS? retrowire May 2015 #14
Yep, and welcome to DU. Jefferson23 May 2015 #15
Thank you! retrowire May 2015 #16
Great to have you and yea, it can get pretty nasty on occassion, if you don't let that get to you Jefferson23 May 2015 #17
They want to profit from it. They don't care about PEOPLE, sabrina 1 May 2015 #22
K & R L0oniX May 2015 #18
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Bernie Sanders Scores A W...»Reply #1