Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)

1. No. The information she could offer is neither specific, nor timely, nor useful to banks

Reply to Truprogressive85 (Original post)

Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:28 PM

Jan 2016

Furthermore, the secrecy laws would stand in the way.

It's sheer influence-peddling....campaign fundraising by another name, or payoff for favors on order or already delivered.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you think Big Banks would pay a person 250k-600k to hear about world affairs & Bin Laden raids ? [View all] Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 OP

No. The information she could offer is neither specific, nor timely, nor useful to banks Proserpina Jan 2016 #1

Let's Find Out.... global1 Jan 2016 #2

I would be glad to read the transcripts MrChuck Jan 2016 #4

The MSM Had Hung Other Politicians For A One Word Misspeak.... global1 Jan 2016 #7

I do not disagree MrChuck Jan 2016 #8

I bet video copies will turn up if she becomes our nominee. What better way to turn off JDPriestly Jan 2016 #3

The banksters wouldn't queer their own pitch! Proserpina Jan 2016 #5

Sheesh, this actually worries me. We have no idea who's holding what dirt on HRC nc4bo Jan 2016 #6

Hillary could not tell them anything more than they can read in a newspaper or a news program. Autumn Jan 2016 #9