Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
In reply to the discussion: Scarborough: Leaving Iowa, Top Journalists Quietly Told Me 'You Know Bernie Won' [View all]mhatrw
(10,786 posts)8. The only thing I don't like about this is that is is actually a LOT EASIER to cheat a TON
when you use voting machines.
At least when it comes to a caucus, you cannot swing 10% of the vote with a single line of code. A caucus at least makes cheating more difficult to accomplish and easier to spot.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Scarborough: Leaving Iowa, Top Journalists Quietly Told Me 'You Know Bernie Won' [View all]
leftcoastmountains
Feb 2016
OP
Doesn't matter... Hillary's campaign is taking on water and sinking fast. She underestimated Bernie, but we sure didn't!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2016
#36
I ageed with them until they got sanctimonious. Let's look at Florida, Steve
roguevalley
Feb 2016
#37
Not all in Hillary's pocket, but all their employers are and they like their paychecks.
merrily
Feb 2016
#5
Sometime ago I read an article on this, very well done, that by far the majority of journalists
RKP5637
Feb 2016
#79
Of course. If I owned a newspaper or TV station, you can bet it would be favoring Bernie
merrily
Feb 2016
#80
I posted an article some time ago. It said that journalists do not want to lose access so they
antigop
Feb 2016
#6
Good info. Appreciate this post. Still is not evidence that Sanders won more than he did.
Midnight Writer
Feb 2016
#34
I believe the superdelegate system was established to prevent the great unwashed masses from
tblue37
Feb 2016
#81
No. Top is a euphemism for corrupt. It's like organized crime, sometimes journalists are asked to
Zen Democrat
Feb 2016
#10
Perhaps journalists who are waiting for hard evidence before they print an inflammatory story
Midnight Writer
Feb 2016
#33
I assume that was a rhetorical question... Bernie doesn't need "top journalists"... he's got the will of the people behind him...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2016
#35
The only thing I don't like about this is that is is actually a LOT EASIER to cheat a TON
mhatrw
Feb 2016
#8
I very much agree. I've been saying all along that if they're going to cheat when there are
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2016
#11
Of course he won or McGuire wouldn't be covering up the raw data. Now, Iowa will never be respected
in_cog_ni_to
Feb 2016
#40
Aaaaand, who's going to make this right? Is anyone, with some ETHICS and Pride in "The First in the
in_cog_ni_to
Feb 2016
#74
The correction needs to be released BEFORE Nevada. Even if it's just the drip, drip, drip of
in_cog_ni_to
Feb 2016
#77
My guess is Bernie won by a fair margin. But not safe enough not to be altered by subterfuge.
Enthusiast
Feb 2016
#45
Oh, I agree completely. We know if the vote "count" differs from the exit polls by more than 1%
Enthusiast
Feb 2016
#58