Bernie Sanders

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)

31. i should have known something was up

Reply to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #29)

Sun Feb 7, 2016, 06:01 PM

Feb 2016

bernies numbers kept increasing for almost an hour, and then a sudden stop.

how much more obvious could they be?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

85 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

is anyone else worried about fraud on tuesday? [View all] restorefreedom Feb 2016 OP

Every lead needs to be above Margin of Error Jackilope Feb 2016 #1

Wish I could..... daleanime Feb 2016 #2

Anyone not worried about fraud hasn't been paying attention... polichick Feb 2016 #3

I think it would be naive to completely rule it out, even so ... Phlem Feb 2016 #4

New Hampshire runs clean elections sarge43 Feb 2016 #5

thank you. its good to hear from people right there. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #9

I'm not saying it couldn't happen, just unlikely. n/t sarge43 Feb 2016 #12

Diebold scanners plus other problems in NH chknltl Feb 2016 #80

I am. Happened against Obama in NH Jarqui Feb 2016 #6

i had heard that some funny stuff happened in 08 restorefreedom Feb 2016 #8

This is worthy of an OP, imho...Notice Hillary 'gaining in NH, with Bernie 'losing' in the lead-up.. AzDar Feb 2016 #52

Yes, Obama was +8, Hillary won by 2; 10 point swing Jarqui Feb 2016 #57

EXTREMELY worried. cui bono Feb 2016 #7

if the wh is concerned enough to get involved, i don't even want to think restorefreedom Feb 2016 #11

Exactly right MissDeeds Feb 2016 #27

it would not surprise me. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #28

All interesting possibilities MissDeeds Feb 2016 #37

i think he has steel resolve. and hopefully good genes. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #44

Funny that the networks all decided at the same time that exit polling was too expensive. Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #10

exactly. i hope bernie has his teams ready to do that. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #13

I think Jeff Weaver is terrific MissDeeds Feb 2016 #32

i just hope it doesn't come to lawsuits restorefreedom Feb 2016 #34

I think it has gone too far even for that, It's time to involve the UN election specialists Dragonfli Feb 2016 #24

they would fight every effort to get monitors. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #30

Of course they would, it is precisely how corrupt election systems work, they resist being caught. Dragonfli Feb 2016 #38

yes, it proves the point. restorefreedom Feb 2016 #46

Yooge plus one! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #47

That's the playbook. We've all seen it before. FourScore Feb 2016 #14

so glad anonymous endorsed bernie restorefreedom Feb 2016 #22

for me, u.s. elections haven't passed the sniff test since 2000 mooseprime Feb 2016 #15

yup. 2000 ripped off the mask restorefreedom Feb 2016 #21

Same here NowSam Feb 2016 #23

+100%! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #45

You're not crazy. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #16

yes, and it just stayed there restorefreedom Feb 2016 #20

It was like torture. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #29

i should have known something was up restorefreedom Feb 2016 #31

Yep, just in the nick of time. TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #36

almost too obvious. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #42

Given what we've seen with the DNC and Iowa Dem party, Jarqui Feb 2016 #17

Why worry? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #18

I feel the same way you do. The Democratic Party has proven that it CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #19

FWIW sarge43 Feb 2016 #25

seems like nh is pretty straight up with its voting restorefreedom Feb 2016 #26

Good point about the voting demographics. It likely could happen that way sarge43 Feb 2016 #40

I'm aware of the possibility, but I don't think so. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #33

thank goodness there are way more primary states restorefreedom Feb 2016 #35

Agreed. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #39

i do worry about nevada restorefreedom Feb 2016 #48

I view Nevada like this: HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #50

very true. good odds for bernie though. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #51

You're not crazy! It was a calculated scheme. Enthusiast Feb 2016 #41

Yes, I am worried. DamnYankeeInHouston Feb 2016 #43

K & R AzDar Feb 2016 #49

Republicans TeddyR Feb 2016 #53

i dont have proof that it will occur, i have a concern restorefreedom Feb 2016 #66

I'm not that worried Mufaddal Feb 2016 #54

It will help if we don't "get over" Iowa. left lowrider Feb 2016 #55

Fraud how? TeddyR Feb 2016 #56

i explained my thought process in the op restorefreedom Feb 2016 #67

So yeah TeddyR Feb 2016 #73

when they account for the iowa votes restorefreedom Feb 2016 #75

That's why the Corrupt Corporate Owned MSM has the polls tighter...to give her a chance to steal it. in_cog_ni_to Feb 2016 #58

you're not joanbarnes Feb 2016 #59

I have worried about fraud every election since 2000. jwirr Feb 2016 #60

When it's this close... Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #61

This is the Democratic Party doing the counting.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #62

You bet I'm worried. Big. 840high Feb 2016 #63

Not crazy. Paka Feb 2016 #64

They will not go quietly. Or legally. Just ask JFK. nt silvershadow Feb 2016 #65

Really, really, really worried Nite Owl Feb 2016 #68

i reread the bernstein interview on cnn and just about got sick restorefreedom Feb 2016 #69

If they do something like Nite Owl Feb 2016 #70

i am trying to remind myself that no one is more invested restorefreedom Feb 2016 #71

I am grateful for Bernie Nite Owl Feb 2016 #72

yup. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #74

You are not crazy but NH is not the place to worry over much about it. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #76

i hope we got the worst state out of the way first restorefreedom Feb 2016 #77

I'm worried about fraud everywhere eridani Feb 2016 #78

yup. it is unfortunate that the first state restorefreedom Feb 2016 #79

of course grasswire Feb 2016 #81

Yes, Diebold is involved in NH chknltl Feb 2016 #82

thats what i suggested a while back restorefreedom Feb 2016 #83

I read that earlier suggestion here at DU, it's a good idea. chknltl Feb 2016 #85

The moment votes go into black boxes, is the end. delrem Feb 2016 #84