Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

3. To be clear

Reply to daleanime (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:35 PM

Feb 2016

I do love Bernie's uniquely corruption free people-based approach,

but I wonder if anyone's done the math, as to the rate of new donors,
and the trajectory of that, factoring in some guess as to where an
average donor would 'max out' and not continue giving.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Open Discussion by & for Berners re: Funding Bernie's long-term GE win. [View all] 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 OP

Bad idea..... daleanime Feb 2016 #1

I think that depends on how the support is structured, and what is being "promised" <-nothing 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #2

To be clear 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #3

I give monthly, plus other times, and I haven't reached 500 yet. Punkingal Feb 2016 #4

It needs to be done RIGHT! Here are some thoughts... Peace Patriot Feb 2016 #5

Thank you for your comments. And I agree about the pristine part. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #6

Not only is it a bad idea Mufaddal Feb 2016 #7

Maybe that's why the donors said "...whether he wants it or not" 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #9

Understood Mufaddal Feb 2016 #11

Okay, just a couple of ideas. First Hillary is being hurt a lot jwirr Feb 2016 #8

This is the kind of creative thinking I was hoping for with the OP, so thanks nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #10