Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
In reply to the discussion: Sanders Opposes Bill to Block GMO Labeling [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)26. And on another related front...
http://www.statnews.com/2016/01/12/califf-senate-vote-fda/
Califf wins Senate panel vote, but faces trouble on food labeling
By SHEILA KAPLAN
JANUARY 12, 2016
WASHINGTON Dr. Robert Califf won approval from a key Senate committee on Tuesday to become the next Food and Drug Administration commissioner, but one senator says shell block his path to a full Senate vote because of a dispute over genetically modified fish.
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee approved Califfs nomination by voice vote, with no senators voting against him. Normally, that would be a sign that the Duke University cardiologist can expect an easy confirmation by the full Senate.
But Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, said she will place a hold on his nomination to prevent a Senate vote, saying shes angry about her treatment by Califf and the FDA when she raised concerns about the agencys plans for the labeling of genetically modified fish.
Murkowski, who wants mandatory labeling, says she talked to Califf about the issue after the committees confirmation hearing in November, and that he promised to listen to her concerns. But shortly after the hearing, the FDA issued guidelines that called for voluntary labeling of genetically modified foods, not mandatory labeling.
Murkowski is convinced that voluntary labeling wont work because not enough companies will comply and she told reporters that Califf was not straightforward with her about what he knew about the FDAs plans. She also said a Department of Health and Human Services official who was supposed to discuss the issue with her merely called her office after hours and left a message.
<>
Califf wins Senate panel vote, but faces trouble on food labeling
By SHEILA KAPLAN
JANUARY 12, 2016
WASHINGTON Dr. Robert Califf won approval from a key Senate committee on Tuesday to become the next Food and Drug Administration commissioner, but one senator says shell block his path to a full Senate vote because of a dispute over genetically modified fish.
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee approved Califfs nomination by voice vote, with no senators voting against him. Normally, that would be a sign that the Duke University cardiologist can expect an easy confirmation by the full Senate.
But Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, said she will place a hold on his nomination to prevent a Senate vote, saying shes angry about her treatment by Califf and the FDA when she raised concerns about the agencys plans for the labeling of genetically modified fish.
Murkowski, who wants mandatory labeling, says she talked to Califf about the issue after the committees confirmation hearing in November, and that he promised to listen to her concerns. But shortly after the hearing, the FDA issued guidelines that called for voluntary labeling of genetically modified foods, not mandatory labeling.
Murkowski is convinced that voluntary labeling wont work because not enough companies will comply and she told reporters that Califf was not straightforward with her about what he knew about the FDAs plans. She also said a Department of Health and Human Services official who was supposed to discuss the issue with her merely called her office after hours and left a message.
<>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Junk science. I suggest you do a little more research. That is the untold scandal of the century
Skwmom
Feb 2016
#46
None of it makes sense. If as you say there is nothing wrong with GMOs and
A Simple Game
Feb 2016
#19
Sarcasm? Anyway, she must've changed her mind, unfortunately. It's a done deal. (nt)
proverbialwisdom
Feb 2016
#40
That's a false comparison, there's no law requiring labeling "natural" or "synthetic"
ag_dude
Feb 2016
#50