Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
26. And on another related front...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:44 AM
Feb 2016
http://www.statnews.com/2016/01/12/califf-senate-vote-fda/

Califf wins Senate panel vote, but faces trouble on food labeling
By SHEILA KAPLAN
JANUARY 12, 2016


WASHINGTON — Dr. Robert Califf won approval from a key Senate committee on Tuesday to become the next Food and Drug Administration commissioner, but one senator says she’ll block his path to a full Senate vote because of a dispute over genetically modified fish.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee approved Califf’s nomination by voice vote, with no senators voting against him. Normally, that would be a sign that the Duke University cardiologist can expect an easy confirmation by the full Senate.

But Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, said she will place a “hold” on his nomination to prevent a Senate vote, saying she’s angry about her treatment by Califf and the FDA when she raised concerns about the agency’s plans for the labeling of genetically modified fish.

Murkowski, who wants mandatory labeling, says she talked to Califf about the issue after the committee’s confirmation hearing in November, and that he promised to listen to her concerns. But shortly after the hearing, the FDA issued guidelines that called for voluntary labeling of genetically modified foods, not mandatory labeling.

Murkowski is convinced that voluntary labeling won’t work because not enough companies will comply — and she told reporters that Califf was “not straightforward” with her about what he knew about the FDA’s plans. She also said a Department of Health and Human Services official who was supposed to discuss the issue with her merely called her office after hours and left a message.

<>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's insane that they want to tell Americans we have no right to know. Skwmom Feb 2016 #1
Down right UnAmerican. jwirr Feb 2016 #8
Exactly. n/t Herman4747 Feb 2016 #11
damn straight! Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #18
Its because noone would buy GMO food! Orange Butterfly Feb 2016 #9
It's insane that they want to tell Americans we have no right to know. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #23
the problem is the labels don't as much inform as scare. alp227 Feb 2016 #32
Junk science. I suggest you do a little more research. That is the untold scandal of the century Skwmom Feb 2016 #46
What specific peer reviewed science are you basing that opinion on? ag_dude Feb 2016 #48
Not really. ag_dude Feb 2016 #41
As you can see from my sig line this is one of jillan Feb 2016 #2
I despise politicians and others Art_from_Ark Feb 2016 #3
The WA State Attorney General has filed a lawsuit floriduck Feb 2016 #4
Funny how fast "states rights" gets thrown under the bus... phantom power Feb 2016 #5
Hillary Clinton opposes GMO labelling Android3.14 Feb 2016 #6
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #7
I'd eat it, but I still think it should be labeled. fbc Feb 2016 #10
So how are they going to spin this one in the Hillary camp? Fearless Feb 2016 #12
She supposedly also supports labeling n2doc Feb 2016 #14
the pro-GMO folks AlbertCat Feb 2016 #24
Thank you Bernie! K&R nt TBF Feb 2016 #13
There is nothing wrong with GMOs. Deadshot Feb 2016 #15
sorry if I don't want to be told how safe they are. I don't want to eat them. bbgrunt Feb 2016 #17
None of it makes sense. If as you say there is nothing wrong with GMOs and A Simple Game Feb 2016 #19
^ THIS ^ mac56 Feb 2016 #21
why wouldn't the companies that manufacture them want to brag about them? AlbertCat Feb 2016 #25
I boycott Walmart and Koch products. katsy Feb 2016 #30
Yep. Deadshot Feb 2016 #36
The point is people have a right to know what they are eating. jg10003 Feb 2016 #22
A choice based on ignorance, not real information. alp227 Feb 2016 #33
^^This^^ Deadshot Feb 2016 #38
It's a choice that doesn't need to be made. Deadshot Feb 2016 #37
K & R! Fuck Monsanto! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #16
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #20
And on another related front... proverbialwisdom Feb 2016 #26
sounds like she needs to get the "hurt feelings" e-mail NJCher Feb 2016 #34
Sarcasm? Anyway, she must've changed her mind, unfortunately. It's a done deal. (nt) proverbialwisdom Feb 2016 #40
That's Bernie! yellerpup Feb 2016 #27
It seems so, doesn't it! NJCher Feb 2016 #35
He's real! yellerpup Feb 2016 #39
There is no reason to prohibit labeling. blackspade Feb 2016 #28
Labeling isn't prohibited and this bill would do nothing to that ag_dude Feb 2016 #43
The effect is the same. blackspade Feb 2016 #44
That's not true. ag_dude Feb 2016 #47
It is true, because there is no uniformity to labeling, nor standards. blackspade Feb 2016 #49
That's a false comparison, there's no law requiring labeling "natural" or "synthetic" ag_dude Feb 2016 #50
I was wondering what angle you were working. blackspade Feb 2016 #52
What an absolutely absurd thing to say. ag_dude Feb 2016 #53
Way to turn that on its head. blackspade Feb 2016 #54
You CAN choose, I want both to have that choice. ag_dude Feb 2016 #55
Damn right I'm against companies having that choice. blackspade Feb 2016 #56
I'm for food choice by people too. ag_dude Feb 2016 #57
I am not concerned about GMO's so much as I think we need to know exactly what we eat dr60omg Feb 2016 #29
k&R azmom Feb 2016 #31
A summary of the GMO labeling issue.. ag_dude Feb 2016 #42
Remember THIS guy? bvar22 Feb 2016 #45
Where does Mrs. Weather-vane come down on this issue ?? berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #51
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Sanders Opposes Bill to B...»Reply #26