Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
23. Jesus Christ, this is key to the case right here ---
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 08:43 PM
Apr 2016
Although redacted almost in its entirety, the e-mail is important because it contains Clinton’s private e-mail server address, hdr22@clintonemail.com. Had the State Department disclosed the e-mail at the time of the 2014 FOIA request, it would have exposed Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server to conduct official State Department business in the early fall of 2014. The timing is significant because the disclosure would have occurred several months before the Clinton campaign says she deleted several thousand “personal” e-mails.

The public was not made aware that Hillary was using a private e-mail server until early 2016!!

But, it gets worse, today the State Department released this warble garble ---

The State Department generally does not comment on matters in litigation. Here, however, there is confusion arising from an administrative error in recent correspondence in which the Department said that the document in question was withheld in November 2014. That is incorrect. The complete facts surrounding this document are set forth in a public court filing from July 2015. As described in the attached filing, the Department received the document in June 2015 from members of former Secretary Clinton’s senior staff, and did not withhold it until that time. The Department regrets any confusion and will be sending corrected correspondence to Judicial Watch.


So, Judicial Watch responded ----

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said, “The State Department can’t keep track of its cover-ups.” Fitton added, ” These changing stories are why two federal court judges granted us discovery.”


I didn't know until today that 2 federal court judges had granted Judicial Watch discovery.

Remember those who said that there was nothing to these FOIA requests?

Obviously, they were wrong!!!!



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

January news. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #1
oh wow - that is old n/t dana_b Apr 2016 #17
I'm glad Bernie is staying to go all the way. Duckfan Apr 2016 #2
Obama's DOJ will indict her at the same time........ Capt.Rocky300 Apr 2016 #7
I expected this. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #3
Have you seen this? Autumn Apr 2016 #4
drip drip drip... thanks berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #6
Hmm, that's new. nt thereismore Apr 2016 #8
so the State Dept may have held back e-mails that prove dana_b Apr 2016 #20
Jesus Christ, this is key to the case right here --- Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #23
But of these, they found something today they didn't turn over. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #5
No wonder they are so anxious to get Sanders to give up the race. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #9
We don't do ourselves any favors when we cite Fox News, Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #12
Fox? Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #16
Your post should have read: Maedhros Apr 2016 #18
Can she be indicted by June? RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #11
good! I think that is something that we all have dana_b Apr 2016 #13
Date RelativelyJones Apr 2016 #14
And still she hasn't been cleared. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #21
The email stuff is bullshit, but this is what they should have been looking into from the start. Lancero Apr 2016 #19
It would have been interesting if they'd ignored it Babel_17 Apr 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Report: FBI expands inves...»Reply #23