Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
In reply to the discussion: FYI. An interesting post by Skinner in ATA [View all]davidpdx
(22,000 posts)97. The answer was arrogant in my opinion
To use the word sanity in any realm to describe a political disagreement is egregious. It is telling someone because they disagree with you that you are not worthy of having an opinion.
It makes me understand why he supports the arrogant, dishonest, and condescending candidate. Way to go on throwing around your wallet Skinner!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That first link is very scary. This is the USA. We don't tell people who to vote for.
jillan
Apr 2016
#31
And that "voted together 93% of the time" bullshit. It is the 7% difference that matters.
djean111
Apr 2016
#47
I don't think there is much of a connection between what I posted and the meal ticket.
merrily
Apr 2016
#37
Either way he looks at it: HALF of his membership will have to ~regain their sanity~ ...
Hiraeth
Apr 2016
#38
It might bring parity to the site, but it wouldn't bring money to the site
winter is coming
Apr 2016
#67
"Regain their sanity" = stigmatizing language weaponizing mental illness as a put down
HereSince1628
Apr 2016
#9
The TOS says we're not supposed to stereotype others but it's ok if it's a stigmatizing term
HereSince1628
Apr 2016
#22
That's only because trauma bonding can't possibly happen among people who have been abused.
Kalidurga
May 2016
#81
Yes, well lots of people use stigmatizing language for a variety of reasons I suppose
HereSince1628
Apr 2016
#45
Something like 90% of the board supports Bernie, but most of us don't support third parties.
w4rma
Apr 2016
#29
Do you think that the 3rd Party talk is their way to hold Hilary's wheel to the left?
The Wielding Truth
Apr 2016
#55
Bernie is the person to do that, but how many have the courage to step up and follow?
The Wielding Truth
Apr 2016
#63
Of course Skinner and other DUers supported Third Party recent Republican Charlie Crist
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2016
#30
I've seen a couple of these TOS alerts I think. And funny thing it's not jury job to police TOS
Paulie
Apr 2016
#60
I'll still hang out in the Lounge. I save my banned advocacy for other places
magical thyme
May 2016
#72
That's ok. When Bernie wins the primary, the TOS will not affect anyone that I can
silvershadow
May 2016
#76