Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

delrem

(9,688 posts)
6. They don't put the time in to appraise the truth because they're propagandists.
Sat May 21, 2016, 11:39 PM
May 2016

They're extremely well paid. Overpaid, in terms of production except in the sickest sense, IMO.

They aren't "journalists", and the "journalists" like Ralston get away with flat out lies because it furthers their employer's interests.

It's much easier for them to just ignore into nonexistence any opposition to their employer's politics, since their employers own the press that gives them voice.

Then, the truth doesn't matter. "Liberal television hosts" like Rachel Maddow make $7 million a year, I hear, for earnestly pontificating about politics and interviewing "liberal pundits" like E. J. Dione of the NYT and Eugene Robinson of the W. Post, and so on through a roster of paid political propagandists. Rarely, if ever, a let up. And we lap it up, just as others lap up Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Mo Dowd's Column on Berni...»Reply #6