Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

Hydra

(14,459 posts)

4. This wasn't supposed to happen this way

Reply to jalan48 (Original post)

Sun May 29, 2016, 02:47 PM

May 2016

The original plan was Hillary/Jeb matchup. Both members of the Bush family, either way they win and the path continues unabated.

Then OWS showed up again as the Bernie campaign. That was not expected, and has still not been successfully tamped down yet.

The endgame is still the same though- corporate rule through trade deals. Not enough support for one world gov't? No problem, they'll just buy said gov'ts and privatize it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New World Order and the 2016 Election [View all] jalan48 May 2016 OP

They are part of the New World Order.. and this is a staged event alright. Bill and Trump bkkyosemite May 2016 #1

After reading about Trump's claim that his campaign "is broke" bjo59 May 2016 #3

With the DNC Chair Admitting System Rigged Against Bernie DianaForRussFeingold May 2016 #7

Have been thinking about this a lot lately. bjo59 May 2016 #2

This wasn't supposed to happen this way Hydra May 2016 #4

I think the switch was made to Trump because of his personality. The media pushed Trump on voters. jalan48 May 2016 #5

Jeb wasn't getting any traction Hydra May 2016 #6

I agree-Kabuki it is. When American's start seeing their laws overturned by corporate tribunals jalan48 May 2016 #9

"The chocolate ration has been increased to 20gm!" Hydra May 2016 #10

LOL @ the chocolate ration. How true. :) jalan48 May 2016 #11

Reading 1984 brought a lot of this into focus for me Hydra May 2016 #12

absolutely - and on many levels hopemountain May 2016 #8

"soft" and "hard" aspirant May 2016 #13

Soft vs hard. You nailed it, sorry to say. CrispyQ May 2016 #14