Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)

14. Actually

Reply to leveymg (Reply #7)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 08:06 AM

Jun 2016

If you look at the first word on the next line down you can clearly see the other half of Hillary Clinton. It ends with what looks like the number 15 or IS. So that definitely says 20% and Hillary Clinton in the same sentence.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Claim: Saudi Arabia funded 20% of Clinton's campaign [View all] EdwardBernays Jun 2016 OP

Prepare for fresh heads buried in the sand. peace13 Jun 2016 #1

This is so wrong on soooooo many levels SmittynMo Jun 2016 #2

Maybe it is time for a third FBI investigation? -none Jun 2016 #3

If the money was channeled though a US-incorporated or listed corp, it's legal under Citizens United leveymg Jun 2016 #5

LEGAL! KPN Jun 2016 #10

Uh, like: "No Shit, Sherlock!!!!' LongTomH Jun 2016 #19

Looks like the original article was posted May 11, if the accompanying Sanders wins WVA is a guide. leveymg Jun 2016 #4

Good snooping EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #6

Not found on Wayback - the URL is the English translation page. What is the Arabic original URL? leveymg Jun 2016 #7

Thanks... EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #8

Actually EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #9

Actually EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #14

In addition to ascertaining accuracy of translation of the Arabic original, leveymg Jun 2016 #15

100% EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #16

Middleeasteye (06/14): Podesta Group claims it was a hack. leveymg Jun 2016 #17

Yes a "hack" EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #18

Makes this all the more newsworthy. Or, it should. leveymg Jun 2016 #20

Or EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #21

I certainly wouldn't doubt it. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #11

Didn't she promise there would be no hint of even an apparent conflict of interest? Scuba Jun 2016 #12

She told the truth EdwardBernays Jun 2016 #13