Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
18. About Sanders' effectiveness, despite the way media covers the "curmudgeon socialist."
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 04:29 AM
Jul 2015

Last edited Sat Sep 12, 2015, 06:11 PM - Edit history (1)

:barf:

As candidate for re-election for Mayor, with no money to speak of and no party backing, he got re-elected as many times as he ran. That is a sign that he was effective for his constituents. Republicans and Democrats grew so frustrated that they joined to back one candidate between them. He won anyway.

He also won when he ran for the House, despite no money to speak of and no party backing.

During his very first year in the House, he founded the Progressive Caucus and chaired it for 8 years. It is the largest Caucus in either house of Congress, including the New Democrat Coalition, except for the general Republican Caucus and Democratic Caucus. (The New Democrat Coalition was formed well after the Progressive Caucus. He is still a member, though he has not been chair since his election to the Senate.

How creative! And how better for an indie to be effective in the massive House? (At its largest, the Caucus had 100 members.)

In the House, he got amendments passed. That is more than some Democrats and Republicans do and the best way to impact legislation as an Indie.

As a Senator, he continued to influence the House by continuing his participation in the Progressive Caucus--its only Senate member. (The Senate has no progressive caucus, only New Democrat). Additionally as the above article indicates, he has built relationship in both the Democratic Caucus, with which he caucuses, and the Republican Caucus. The DSCC will not support any Democrat who runs against him. Schumer, slated to be Democratic Leader has praised him, calling him an asset, as did Howard Dean, when Dean headed the DNC. Even though he did not join the Vermont Democratic Party, it gave him its nomination, which he declined. With relation to his run for POTUS, it has recognized him as a member, as has the DNC.

A deal he negotiated with John McCain about care of veterans is one of the case studies in effective negotiation taught at the Brookings Institute. John McCain praised his ability to get things done on Morning Joe within the last couple of weeks.

Don't be fooled by sucky media coverage. He is no lightweight curmudgeon with his glory days long behind him.

Very nice compliments, even from Republicans for Bernie. 'He's not the type to suddenly sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #1
If he says "This is my position" you know damn well that's his position. It's a shame that's so rare arcane1 Jul 2015 #7
That's what most people see in him, you can trust what he says which he sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #9
One reason the Rs tried it on so much with Obama is that he bent over backward tblue37 Sep 2015 #28
Very well said! arcane1 Sep 2015 #30
Exactly! tex-wyo-dem Jul 2015 #16
Interesting. Thanks. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #2
Well this seems to go against another one of the memes TM99 Jul 2015 #3
I suspect a lot of people will bend over backwards to work with him, passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #5
Reviving Glass-Steagall, for example, has bipartisan support. Sanders agrees, Clinton does not. arcane1 Jul 2015 #8
It's kinda hard not to like someone who is smart and honest passiveporcupine Jul 2015 #4
Wow! Some actual political news for a change. Thank you National Journal 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #6
Another possibility is that the Repub's new-found love for Bernie COLGATE4 Jul 2015 #10
If that turns out to be true, they will end up slapped in the face with their own ass. arcane1 Jul 2015 #12
That is true for some like Cruz and a couple pundits who think he is easier appalachiablue Jul 2015 #13
What they say and what they think are two different things. merrily Jul 2015 #19
I've no doubt they're thinking about this kind of thing, not inconsequential- appalachiablue Jul 2015 #23
I'm impressed. merrily Jul 2015 #24
Of course. Idiots bitch about "socialism," but don't know what it is and actually love it. EEO Jul 2015 #11
Kick and R BeanMusical Jul 2015 #14
Figured they would libodem Jul 2015 #15
Please see Reply 19. merrily Jul 2015 #20
Yep libodem Jul 2015 #17
About Sanders' effectiveness, despite the way media covers the "curmudgeon socialist." merrily Jul 2015 #18
socialist curmudgeon, my ass. National Journal is NOT to be trusted, esp. about a politician merrily Jul 2015 #21
Kick! grahamhgreen Jul 2015 #22
I've talked to few republicans who despise azmom Jul 2015 #25
K n R Cosmic Kitten Jul 2015 #26
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Sep 2015 #27
Bumped up! SoapBox Sep 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Bernie Sanders Is a Loud,...»Reply #18