Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
90. She should have been kicked to the curb a long time ago.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 04:55 PM
Aug 2015

The fact that the Democratic Party Leadership has NOT done so
says a lot about where the "Democratic Party" is today.



In 2008 Debbie Wasserman Schultz refused to endorse these 3 Democrats
who had won their Primaries and had a chance to win Republican seats:

Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Joe Garcia

Former Hialeah Democratic Mayor Raul Martinez

Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo

All three had won their local Democratic Primaries, and were challenging Hard Core Republican incumbents with whom Wasserman-Schultz had become cozy.
Not only did the head of the DCCC Red to Blue Program REFUSE to endorse these Democratic challengers,
but she appeared in person at at least one (possibly more) Campaign/Fundraiser for their Republican opponents.




FL-18, FL-21, FL-25: Wasserman Schultz Wants Dem Challengers to Lose
by: James L.
Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 7:15 PM EDT
<snip>

Sensing a shift in the political climate of the traditionally solid-GOP turf of the Miami area, Democrats have lined up three strong challengers -- Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, and businesswoman Annette Taddeo to take on Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, respectively.

While there is an enormous sense of excitement and optimism surrounding these candidacies, some Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Kendrick Meek, are all too eager to kneecap these Democratic challengers right out of the starting gate in the spirit of "comity" and "bipartisan cooperation" with their Republican colleagues:

But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.

"At the end of the day, we need a member who isn't going to pull any punches, who isn't going to be hesitant," Wasserman Schultz said.

Now, you'd expect this kind of bullshit from a backbencher like Alcee Hastings, but you wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the co-chair of the DCCC's Red to Blue program, which is the position that Wasserman Schultz currently holds. Apparently, Debbie did not get Rahm's memo about doing whatever it takes to win:

The national party, enthusiastic about the three Democratic challengers, has not yet selected Red to Blue participants. But Wasserman Schultz has already told the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that if any of the three make the cut, another Democrat should be assigned to the race.

http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1537










The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.

They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."

This prompted even harsher reaction from perhaps the most influential of the progressive political bloggers, Markos Moulitsas, a.k.a. Kos, founder of Daily Kos, who wrote on his blog Wednesday: "On so many fronts, the Republicans are standing in the way of progress, on Iraq, SCHIP, health care, fiscal responsibility, corruption, civil liberties, and so on. Those three south Florida Republicans are part of that problem. And she's (Wasserman-Schultz) going to be 'frustrated' that people demand she do her job?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/19/AR2008031903410_3.html


Here are Kos comments on the Wasserman-Schultz betrayal of the Democratic Party:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/03/20/480511/-DCCC-Says-Uproar-Over-DWS-Recusal-Much-Ado-About-Nothing




A lot of time has passed since 2008, but I don't take these kinds of betrayals lightly.

bvar22
Cursed with a memory

"I want to thank Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for being an outstanding chair of our party. (Applause.) She is a great partner."--President Obama


With "partners" like this, we don't need Republicans!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Go Bernie! newfie11 Aug 2015 #1
If Barack Can Win Then Bernie Can Win billhicks76 Aug 2015 #115
My favorite (today) - "Establishment Dem endorses Establishment Dem!!!!" djean111 Aug 2015 #2
djean, may I say again how much I value your brilliant posts? merrily Aug 2015 #7
That was known to be a hallmark of the Republicans (the idea of establishing turns) Babel_17 Aug 2015 #37
I don't know why we adopted that strategy after McCain and Romney lost the general. merrily Aug 2015 #41
Only a few weeks ago the DU meme was that Sanders didn't have ENOUGH money arcane1 Aug 2015 #42
In fairness, that's two different pots of money. One is campaign funds and the other is personal merrily Aug 2015 #43
No, seriously, there was an OP that said his personal finances are too low to be president. arcane1 Aug 2015 #46
That poster would really be upset if Bernie were to be President for 8 years and leave A Simple Game Aug 2015 #63
I saw it too. I mentioned in my Reply 7. merrily Aug 2015 #74
Today, Thinking About posted that Sanders votes for military budgets and that JDPriestly Aug 2015 #54
I don't know, man...when you look at some of these turds in Congress, they PatrickforO Aug 2015 #72
You mean he gives to the poor? artislife Aug 2015 #97
I don't know for certain, but I suspect him merrily Aug 2015 #98
Well, when we look at Bernie's cohort strategery blunder Aug 2015 #8
$21.5 MILLION: Hillary's Net Worth TBF Aug 2015 #24
And, if she runs out, her husband will share. In 2008, their assets were $110 million, IIRC. merrily Aug 2015 #79
Wowza, I thought that WAS combined income. TBF Aug 2015 #81
If it is combined, they didn't manage the fortune they had in 2008 very well. merrily Aug 2015 #82
Good post! nikto Aug 2015 #109
She may beat herself this time around. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #3
Chapter 6: “The Email That Can Land You In Jail.” Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #4
No wonder they're floating Biden and Gore - TBF Aug 2015 #27
Oops! HappyPlace Aug 2015 #111
^^ THIS ^^ All things being equal HRC wins hands down. However, the "keystone cops" jonno99 Aug 2015 #77
Phew! - LiberalElite Aug 2015 #5
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #6
The difference: merrily Aug 2015 #9
Sadly correct Hydra Aug 2015 #28
Technically, two New Democrats running against each other and two DNC insiders. merrily Aug 2015 #31
H. Clinton and Obama have pretty much the same ideologies, so Obama had to try rhett o rick Aug 2015 #60
Thanks Rick. I agree as to Sanders having a better shot at winning the general. merrily Aug 2015 #62
Rahmbo!! CrispyQ Aug 2015 #71
Gods... kenfrequed Aug 2015 #73
Rahm wasn't such a shock to me as he gave a big hint of what was to come when he picked Rick Warren rhett o rick Aug 2015 #76
I think Obama thought he could make nice with righties and wanted to be senz Aug 2015 #100
Obama verbally distanced himself from the organization DLC in 2007, (?) bvar22 Aug 2015 #83
Yes (sigh) Whaddayagonnadoo merrily Aug 2015 #86
And this move sealed the deal too! cascadiance Aug 2015 #88
She should have been kicked to the curb a long time ago. bvar22 Aug 2015 #90
I don't understand Blue Dog Dems. senz Aug 2015 #101
This is the only page of the DNC I visit & I visit it often, for all the good it does. CrispyQ Aug 2015 #94
The main reason that Obama won was that people felt they could "HOPE" he would be better... cascadiance Aug 2015 #85
To be fair, there was change. He was NOT Bush's third term. merrily Aug 2015 #87
And that fear card is always played on us to avoid a change being made to the Democrats... cascadiance Aug 2015 #89
That was no fear card. It was a statement about Obama. merrily Aug 2015 #91
Yes, many of us pragmatically voted for Obama in that instance... cascadiance Aug 2015 #92
I was totally gung ho in 2008. I was pragmatic in 2012. merrily Aug 2015 #93
Despite claims to the contrary, he also ran as a "Populist". bvar22 Aug 2015 #105
And I believe that John Edwards was INTENTIONALLY left in the race to "gather liberal votes"... cascadiance Aug 2015 #75
I have some of the same doubts. bvar22 Aug 2015 #84
Bernie's top 10 donors don't even add up to Emily's List PAC, #5 on HRC's top 10 list. CrispyQ Aug 2015 #70
This is why Bernie needs us. merrily Aug 2015 #80
I loved the way those lists were spun senz Aug 2015 #102
More like the investment bankers are contributing to Hillary and the machinists to Bernie. merrily Aug 2015 #113
Definitely. senz Aug 2015 #118
Do right wingers ever admit trusty elf Aug 2015 #10
I hope to hear Kristol say the same thing about Bernie thesquanderer Aug 2015 #26
Now they are all saying nice things about him NoDakJoe Aug 2015 #11
WTF? merrily Aug 2015 #16
I think (but am not certain) that what is meant is that the only reason ANYONE would say djean111 Aug 2015 #33
Yes, I got that. But how the fuck is that an appropriate post for this group? merrily Aug 2015 #34
Look at the post count. It is a typical defecate and run post. Very typical. n/t djean111 Aug 2015 #35
I saw the post count. I wish our hosts had delete power. merrily Aug 2015 #36
They truly are ... TheFarS1de Aug 2015 #119
Focus on Bernie. What anyone says doesn't matter. March 1 will matter. merrily Aug 2015 #120
So for them it's all "personality." Nothing more. senz Aug 2015 #104
Good point, I knew Rush was praising Bernie but didn't realize the other two were also. A Simple Game Aug 2015 #68
Bernie is a different case treestar Aug 2015 #12
You know you're posting in the Sanders Group, not the BOG or the Hilary Group, right? merrily Aug 2015 #13
Didn't you know? The other groups are protected, but the Bernie group is fair game. djean111 Aug 2015 #15
I can't worry about what they call us. merrily Aug 2015 #17
Ha! I don't worry, in fact, it is sort of reassuring. n/t djean111 Aug 2015 #21
As long as it JackInGreen Aug 2015 #23
But Sanders Isn't Obama AlbertCat Aug 2015 #47
depends on how you read it. merrily Aug 2015 #48
Quite a few of us would like to feel as safe AlbertCat Aug 2015 #49
Thanks, but the only time I can recall not knowing what year it was merrily Aug 2015 #51
Thanks, but the only time I can recall not knowing what year it was AlbertCat Aug 2015 #53
Stop it. I moved off that post before 8 this morning. Even then, my entire post was "WTF?" merrily Aug 2015 #55
Stop it. I moved off that post before 8 this morning. Even then, my entire post was "WTF?" AlbertCat Aug 2015 #64
I thought that people stopped that repeating tactic before grade school. merrily Aug 2015 #66
You're right, Bernie is way ahead Admiral Loinpresser Aug 2015 #56
Looks like we need to add "Bernie Group" to thread titles. Like "Obama Group" and "HRC Group" djean111 Aug 2015 #14
+1000 MissDeeds Aug 2015 #29
That assumes someone would respect the notation. merrily Aug 2015 #58
You need to vote and support Rick Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #18
Love it! jonno99 Aug 2015 #78
You are in a protected group. Post accordingly. This is the only warning you will get. Autumn Aug 2015 #20
Missed the point entirely. n/t Dawgs Aug 2015 #30
This group is for supporters of Bernie Sanders. smokey nj Aug 2015 #32
And history doesn't...... daleanime Aug 2015 #40
IMO, history is not repeating itself so fair. merrily Aug 2015 #59
Nooooo JackInGreen Aug 2015 #69
"Bernie is not Obama." BeanMusical Aug 2015 #99
The pundintocracy Le Taz Hot Aug 2015 #19
I find it amusing ....... a lot of games are being played Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #22
Great. Thank you for that. merrily Aug 2015 #25
Plus the fact they tried to deport him for years. He finally won. But the 'Right' hated him. YOHABLO Aug 2015 #110
Of course they hated him. Start with the long hair and it's all downhill from there. merrily Aug 2015 #114
K&R!! nt AikenYankee Aug 2015 #38
Funny that some of those who actually supported Barack Obama and now support Hillary Clinton davidpdx Aug 2015 #39
k&r avaistheone1 Aug 2015 #44
That is really funny. SoapBox Aug 2015 #45
Isn't the term "wealthy academics" an oxymoron? colorado_ufo Aug 2015 #50
It fooled me. Hahaha azmom Aug 2015 #52
That punchline was a surprise. Binkie The Clown Aug 2015 #57
Heh-heh! cer7711 Aug 2015 #61
Well done! Zorra Aug 2015 #65
Buwahahaha! Cleita Aug 2015 #67
Excellent boatsnhose Aug 2015 #95
Gonna go Bern one right now Blue Owl Aug 2015 #96
Nice post. Eleanors38 Aug 2015 #103
Like I have said before. WHEN CRABS ROAR Aug 2015 #106
You had me fooled! ozone_man Aug 2015 #107
I prefer to go forward. not backwards PatrynXX Aug 2015 #108
She was going to win 08 awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #112
politics makes strange bedfellows, after all, you Bernie types repeat the same ericson00 Aug 2015 #116
"Bernie types?" smokey nj Aug 2015 #117
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»He's not gonna beat Clint...»Reply #90