Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
In reply to the discussion: He's not gonna beat Clinton ........ Bernie Group [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)90. She should have been kicked to the curb a long time ago.
The fact that the Democratic Party Leadership has NOT done so
says a lot about where the "Democratic Party" is today.
In 2008 Debbie Wasserman Schultz refused to endorse these 3 Democrats
who had won their Primaries and had a chance to win Republican seats:
Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Joe Garcia
Former Hialeah Democratic Mayor Raul Martinez
Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo
All three had won their local Democratic Primaries, and were challenging Hard Core Republican incumbents with whom Wasserman-Schultz had become cozy.
Not only did the head of the DCCC Red to Blue Program REFUSE to endorse these Democratic challengers,
but she appeared in person at at least one (possibly more) Campaign/Fundraiser for their Republican opponents.
FL-18, FL-21, FL-25: Wasserman Schultz Wants Dem Challengers to Lose
by: James L.
Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 7:15 PM EDT
<snip>
Sensing a shift in the political climate of the traditionally solid-GOP turf of the Miami area, Democrats have lined up three strong challengers -- Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, and businesswoman Annette Taddeo to take on Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, respectively.
While there is an enormous sense of excitement and optimism surrounding these candidacies, some Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Kendrick Meek, are all too eager to kneecap these Democratic challengers right out of the starting gate in the spirit of "comity" and "bipartisan cooperation" with their Republican colleagues:
But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.
"At the end of the day, we need a member who isn't going to pull any punches, who isn't going to be hesitant," Wasserman Schultz said.
Now, you'd expect this kind of bullshit from a backbencher like Alcee Hastings, but you wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the co-chair of the DCCC's Red to Blue program, which is the position that Wasserman Schultz currently holds. Apparently, Debbie did not get Rahm's memo about doing whatever it takes to win:
The national party, enthusiastic about the three Democratic challengers, has not yet selected Red to Blue participants. But Wasserman Schultz has already told the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that if any of the three make the cut, another Democrat should be assigned to the race.
http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1537
The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.
They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."
This prompted even harsher reaction from perhaps the most influential of the progressive political bloggers, Markos Moulitsas, a.k.a. Kos, founder of Daily Kos, who wrote on his blog Wednesday: "On so many fronts, the Republicans are standing in the way of progress, on Iraq, SCHIP, health care, fiscal responsibility, corruption, civil liberties, and so on. Those three south Florida Republicans are part of that problem. And she's (Wasserman-Schultz) going to be 'frustrated' that people demand she do her job?"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/19/AR2008031903410_3.html
Here are Kos comments on the Wasserman-Schultz betrayal of the Democratic Party:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/03/20/480511/-DCCC-Says-Uproar-Over-DWS-Recusal-Much-Ado-About-Nothing
A lot of time has passed since 2008, but I don't take these kinds of betrayals lightly.
bvar22
Cursed with a memory
"I want to thank Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for being an outstanding chair of our party. (Applause.) She is a great partner."--President Obama
With "partners" like this, we don't need Republicans!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That was known to be a hallmark of the Republicans (the idea of establishing turns)
Babel_17
Aug 2015
#37
I don't know why we adopted that strategy after McCain and Romney lost the general.
merrily
Aug 2015
#41
In fairness, that's two different pots of money. One is campaign funds and the other is personal
merrily
Aug 2015
#43
No, seriously, there was an OP that said his personal finances are too low to be president.
arcane1
Aug 2015
#46
That poster would really be upset if Bernie were to be President for 8 years and leave
A Simple Game
Aug 2015
#63
Today, Thinking About posted that Sanders votes for military budgets and that
JDPriestly
Aug 2015
#54
And, if she runs out, her husband will share. In 2008, their assets were $110 million, IIRC.
merrily
Aug 2015
#79
^^ THIS ^^ All things being equal HRC wins hands down. However, the "keystone cops"
jonno99
Aug 2015
#77
Technically, two New Democrats running against each other and two DNC insiders.
merrily
Aug 2015
#31
H. Clinton and Obama have pretty much the same ideologies, so Obama had to try
rhett o rick
Aug 2015
#60
Thanks Rick. I agree as to Sanders having a better shot at winning the general.
merrily
Aug 2015
#62
Rahm wasn't such a shock to me as he gave a big hint of what was to come when he picked Rick Warren
rhett o rick
Aug 2015
#76
This is the only page of the DNC I visit & I visit it often, for all the good it does.
CrispyQ
Aug 2015
#94
The main reason that Obama won was that people felt they could "HOPE" he would be better...
cascadiance
Aug 2015
#85
And that fear card is always played on us to avoid a change being made to the Democrats...
cascadiance
Aug 2015
#89
And I believe that John Edwards was INTENTIONALLY left in the race to "gather liberal votes"...
cascadiance
Aug 2015
#75
Bernie's top 10 donors don't even add up to Emily's List PAC, #5 on HRC's top 10 list.
CrispyQ
Aug 2015
#70
More like the investment bankers are contributing to Hillary and the machinists to Bernie.
merrily
Aug 2015
#113
I think (but am not certain) that what is meant is that the only reason ANYONE would say
djean111
Aug 2015
#33
Look at the post count. It is a typical defecate and run post. Very typical. n/t
djean111
Aug 2015
#35
Good point, I knew Rush was praising Bernie but didn't realize the other two were also.
A Simple Game
Aug 2015
#68
You know you're posting in the Sanders Group, not the BOG or the Hilary Group, right?
merrily
Aug 2015
#13
Didn't you know? The other groups are protected, but the Bernie group is fair game.
djean111
Aug 2015
#15
Stop it. I moved off that post before 8 this morning. Even then, my entire post was "WTF?"
merrily
Aug 2015
#55
Stop it. I moved off that post before 8 this morning. Even then, my entire post was "WTF?"
AlbertCat
Aug 2015
#64
Looks like we need to add "Bernie Group" to thread titles. Like "Obama Group" and "HRC Group"
djean111
Aug 2015
#14
You are in a protected group. Post accordingly. This is the only warning you will get.
Autumn
Aug 2015
#20
Plus the fact they tried to deport him for years. He finally won. But the 'Right' hated him.
YOHABLO
Aug 2015
#110
Of course they hated him. Start with the long hair and it's all downhill from there.
merrily
Aug 2015
#114
Funny that some of those who actually supported Barack Obama and now support Hillary Clinton
davidpdx
Aug 2015
#39
politics makes strange bedfellows, after all, you Bernie types repeat the same
ericson00
Aug 2015
#116