Since When Are Democrats Afraid of Debates? [View all]
The Democratic National Committee needs to adapt to the new politics of 2016. Instead of constraining debate, as it has so far, the DNC should change course and encourage an open and freewheeling discourse. This is not just the right choice; its the politically practical thing to do.
Like it or not, the 2016 campaign is in full swing, and Americans are engaging with it. A record-breaking 24 million viewers tuned in to watch the August 6 GOP debatemore Americans than voted in all of the Republican primaries and caucuses of 2012 combined. Its easy to dismiss these debates as clown car spectacles, considering the atrocious statements coming from Donald Trump and his apprentices. Yet since that first debate, Trump and other Republicans have seen their numbers spike in polls pairing them against anticipated Democratic opponents in 2016.
Democrats are making a serious mistake if they imagine that theyll somehow benefit by letting the Republicans claim center stage as summer gives way to fall. And activists who want to hear serious discussions of issues too frequently neglected by Republicansfrom mass incarceration to climate change to nuclear disarmament to expanding Social Security and saving the Postal Serviceshould be outraged by the prospect that Democrats will not have enough debates, or enough flexibility, to fully explore these vital issues.
Its not enough that Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Martin OMalley, Lincoln Chafee, and Jim Webb are campaigning (or that Joe Biden is pondering). The Republican candidates are debatingand far more Americans tune in to debates than attend events on the campaign trail.
As it stands now, the Democrats have scheduled just six debates, as opposed to the dozen proposed by the GOP. Even more absurd is the fact that the first Democratic debate is set for mid-October, more than two months after the Republicans
got started.
more
http://www.thenation.com/article/since-when-are-democrats-afraid-of-debates/