Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
3. Thank you.
Thu May 7, 2015, 09:23 AM
May 2015
This is an example of why the "if Progressives would vote locally they would have more representation" is utter bullshit. The Third Way folks pick the candidates at a certain level, and there is not much other candidates can do.



Even huger bs: Find your own candidates for POTUS and persuade them to run. That one is so far-fetched, yet got posted at DU so often, it HAD to be a talking point.

While pandering is definitely undesirable, at least they are giving lip service to leftists. Even the perceived need to pander to the left is considerable progress.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12777724

Not to mention that pandering to the left sure makes one skeptical that the left of the left is such a small minority everywhere but DU.

If we are such a small minority within the party and/or the country, why are politicians even bothering to pander to us? Why run to the left? After all, Democrats are confident that "the left has nowhere else to go."

Why not run to the alleged centrist majority's way of thinking? Hell, even DLC co-founder Hillary isn't doing that.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Dems can do better than &...»Reply #3