Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 12:40 PM Dec 2015

A note about polling... [View all]

From the Guardian UK...Dan Roberts and Mona Chalabi...


But perhaps, like the uncertainty principle in physics, the more an election is scrutinised the more the scrutiny risks interfering. If this interference is compounded by technological shifts making traditional poll methods increasingly unreliable, there could be a far larger threat to the democratic process than simply the free speech of pollsters.


The influence is especially bad if the polls are paid for by political campaigns...

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A note about polling... [View all] Thespian2 Dec 2015 OP
This Citizen Suspects That Polling Is As Compromised As Electronic Voting cantbeserious Dec 2015 #1
+1 daleanime Dec 2015 #4
+ a GAZILLION! in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #6
Agreed. Menshunables Dec 2015 #9
Thing is, the popularity of some of these candidates strains credibility Android3.14 Dec 2015 #2
No matter what though, Pataki LiberalElite Dec 2015 #3
Thanks for this... Thespian2 Dec 2015 #5
IMCPO, BOTH political parties make use of the hackable evoting machines. in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #7
YEP Thespian2 Dec 2015 #8
Exactly - that's why the CORPORATE OWNED pollsters must keep her numbers high. in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #10
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»A note about polling...»Reply #0