Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

In reply to the discussion: A note about polling... [View all]
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
2. Thing is, the popularity of some of these candidates strains credibility
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 12:14 PM
Dec 2015

Trump's numbers are fairly spot on based on the people I work with. In my business, I interact with about a 60-40 split of conservatives and liberals. The number of Trumpsters is about 1-in-6, and the Sanders people are about 2-in-6, with both groups loud and enthusiastic. With Clinton, the only support I see is from a few of my southern Democrat acquaintances, and it is lukewarm at best. The other GOoPers are not even on the radar.

The published polls are just money manipulating the larger population demographics from which they draw their poll responses. For example, a poll can say that it draws from likely Democratic voters, but what they don't tell you is that it is likely Democratic voters who also watch Wheel of Fortune or Dancing With the Stars or some other criteria that tends to include a large number of supporters for a specific candidate.

Seeing how aggressive the HRC support has become on DU, especially as the numbers have contracted even further, it is obvious the internal polling is far different than what the campaigns are releasing.

My hope is that it is more difficult to cheat with a caucus tally than with the regular ballot box, electronic or paper.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A note about polling... [View all] Thespian2 Dec 2015 OP
This Citizen Suspects That Polling Is As Compromised As Electronic Voting cantbeserious Dec 2015 #1
+1 daleanime Dec 2015 #4
+ a GAZILLION! in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #6
Agreed. Menshunables Dec 2015 #9
Thing is, the popularity of some of these candidates strains credibility Android3.14 Dec 2015 #2
No matter what though, Pataki LiberalElite Dec 2015 #3
Thanks for this... Thespian2 Dec 2015 #5
IMCPO, BOTH political parties make use of the hackable evoting machines. in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #7
YEP Thespian2 Dec 2015 #8
Exactly - that's why the CORPORATE OWNED pollsters must keep her numbers high. in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #10
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»A note about polling...»Reply #2