Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
8. If you give half a damn about women's health care and women's issues,
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 07:39 PM
Jan 2016

this is not the way to show it. Cancelling donations to PP makes less women's health services available to low income women. Very disappointing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I will say again - very stupid move SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #1
Very sad. They've served so well for so long. Bubzer Jan 2016 #98
Looking for an email addy for them. nm rhett o rick Jan 2016 #137
They alienated a large group of donors and potential donors for nothing. Stupid. Shrike47 Jan 2016 #2
If Hillary's primary opponent was anti-PP, it would be ok dreamnightwind Jan 2016 #3
Thats what I said! liberalnarb Jan 2016 #68
Cool, went over there and rec'd it for ya. dreamnightwind Jan 2016 #86
obviously hrc is going for quantity but that isn't votes, its framing. she will lose votes this way roguevalley Jan 2016 #95
It is her trend line artislife Jan 2016 #124
exactly. delrem Jan 2016 #101
Oh dear... nt retrowire Jan 2016 #4
wanna bet they didn't ask any members, as usual? MisterP Jan 2016 #5
"Clinton will retaliate"--sure says a lot about Clinton and why I am for Bernie emsimon33 Jan 2016 #7
Her campaign is all about capturing the gatekeepers and power brokers, not the hearts and minds GoneFishin Jan 2016 #93
+100 peace13 Jan 2016 #102
Yep. It's an unfortunate move for PP. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #111
But they could have simply stayed neutral until the GE. This was an unforced error. nt tblue37 Jan 2016 #103
Exactly n/t MissDeeds Jan 2016 #113
Then PP should have skipped the endorsement--like they have EVERY OTHER TIME Proserpina Jan 2016 #114
It was a terrible move as they were already under attack from the right emsimon33 Jan 2016 #6
Single payer may mean no need for PP Bubzer Jan 2016 #99
So, basically fuck all young women with no means to pay for contraception. lark Jan 2016 #122
Then PP shouldn't have endorsed in a primary. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #135
Exactly!! smokey nj Jan 2016 #145
If you give half a damn about women's health care and women's issues, Skidmore Jan 2016 #8
however... SandersDem Jan 2016 #10
buthow long would it take to implement universal covrage? passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #20
"you are cutting donations for immediate needs" - not quite. Bubzer Jan 2016 #100
That doesn't sound like a lot considering how many people they serve passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #128
It may not sound like a lot of money, but it is. Especially for a non profit serving pulic interest. Bubzer Jan 2016 #149
You really should quote the part of your post that is directly from the link passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #150
You can pull up the 2014 annual report to get the break out of their expenditures. Bubzer Jan 2016 #152
Sorry, but you are going to have to give me something better passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #153
Didn't you see the table of contents is on page 3? Bubzer Jan 2016 #155
Another reason they should stay kacekwl Jan 2016 #127
So should everyone stay neutral? passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #129
Don't you get that they've NEVER endorsed in a primary before? smokey nj Jan 2016 #146
I would rather they keep the floriduck Jan 2016 #38
This is their own Komen moment. hay rick Jan 2016 #74
well said. nashville_brook Jan 2016 #115
I have to agree unapatriciated Jan 2016 #81
"they have not done this in previous elections" Enthusiast Jan 2016 #104
Very disappointing that PP had to get political. I bet HRC campaign put the pressure rhett o rick Jan 2016 #130
they should stay out of politics period nt grasswire Jan 2016 #9
Dont' be such an idealogue that you let your actions hurt people in need now passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #21
It's Planned Parenthood who has acted irresponsibilty, not the people Fawke Em Jan 2016 #138
and think their money might go towards helping her beat their preferred candidates passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #139
Donated $300 to PP, $750 to Bernie central scrutinizer Jan 2016 #11
this is the best response right here, central has it right :) SandersDem Jan 2016 #16
Excellent. Duppers Jan 2016 #25
+1. bvf Jan 2016 #29
^^^THIS^^^ But I am kind of thrilled about this. If PP jwirr Jan 2016 #57
I'll forgive Planned Parenthood anything Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #12
The organization but not the leadership. They showed bad judgement. I bet they were rhett o rick Jan 2016 #131
It was one of the dumbest moves PP could make when all three Democratic Candidates are in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #13
yep 840high Jan 2016 #26
"Short-sighted" jomin41 Jan 2016 #117
... in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #119
Agreed. zentrum Jan 2016 #14
^^ This^^ Marie Marie Jan 2016 #87
I'm redirecting my financial support directly to candidates who support Planned Parenthood. We need Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #15
'because universal healthcare (which he is promoting) would remove the need for PP’s services' TheProgressive Jan 2016 #17
Good point. Thanks. Mc Mike Jan 2016 #107
Huge mistake on their part....Cecile Richards is definitely no Ann Richards andrewv1 Jan 2016 #18
I was thinking, why doesn't PP also endorse Bernie and Martin, but... Akamai Jan 2016 #142
I have a strong desire to stop my donations but probably will not. BlueJazz Jan 2016 #19
Thank you passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #23
Choosing a political action instead of the needs of real people...like PP just did? jeff47 Jan 2016 #27
My pleasure BlueJazz Jan 2016 #45
Planned Parenthood was the one that choose political over needs davidpdx Jan 2016 #90
Dumb move! nt Duval Jan 2016 #22
I cancelled my monthly donation too. Why would they stick their nose williesgirl Jan 2016 #24
Yep... Planned Parenthood bought and paid for by Clinton now. JimDandy Jan 2016 #35
You're going to need 70 Democratic Senators and about 300 big L Liberals Arkana Jan 2016 #65
half the country that is eligible to vote does not vote questionseverything Jan 2016 #73
It's a high goal, but worth fighting for considering the alternative. nm rhett o rick Jan 2016 #133
Stunningly stupid move on the part of PP. Right up there with DWS dumping on younger women. Ford_Prefect Jan 2016 #28
+100000 azmom Jan 2016 #83
the daughter of PP’s president, Lily Adams is Hillary Clinton’s Iowa communications director. AlbertCat Jan 2016 #30
Wow. SheilaT Jan 2016 #31
It's not just her daughter EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #32
Universal Health Care, or PP Jobs? marksda Jan 2016 #33
A mistake as big as ... Susan Komen? ... Trajan Jan 2016 #34
That was my first thought as well.... peacebird Jan 2016 #110
Just remember passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #36
Planned Parenthood hurt the people who need their services. smokey nj Jan 2016 #37
Sorry, you cannot absolve your responsibility for your actions that way passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #39
You don't get to tell people what to do with their money. smokey nj Jan 2016 #42
Freedom of speech means I can tell you what I think of the way you spend your money. passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #51
I'm as entitled to my opinion as you are to yours and I think you are wrong. smokey nj Jan 2016 #54
I'd rather be blamed for castigating people that for denying the needy the help they seek. passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #55
I haven't denied anybody anything. smokey nj Jan 2016 #58
If you are not withholding funds from PP because of them backing Clinton passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #59
I won't donate until they get out of politics. I didn't hear the sniffles about komen. roguevalley Jan 2016 #97
Really? Comparing Komen to PP? passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #136
when they do quid pro quo and step into politics without a care what it means to their roguevalley Jan 2016 #147
when pp endorsed hc they are denying the 30 million of us left out of the aca, our care questionseverything Jan 2016 #61
I Understand why this is upsetting for you, passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #66
older people have to pay 3 times as much to be insured under the aca questionseverything Jan 2016 #71
I agree there are some serious problems with the ACA passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #76
I am not castigating anyone for expressing their opinion passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #125
That's why I send my money to http://www.fundabortionnow.org/ eggplant Jan 2016 #78
Planned Parenthood isn't the only game in town. smokey nj Jan 2016 #79
Thanks for that link. progressoid Jan 2016 #96
A mistake, in my opinion mountain grammy Jan 2016 #40
Yikes... WillyT Jan 2016 #41
As pissed as I am about this unfortunate fredamae Jan 2016 #43
I went directly to their website and unsubscribed from their action list after the Duckfan Jan 2016 #44
I'm not familiar with this particular incident Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #46
unsurprising but an interesting angle stupidicus Jan 2016 #47
Looking for an alternate place to send your PP money? http://www.fundabortionnow.org/ eggplant Jan 2016 #48
Thank you for this link. smokey nj Jan 2016 #49
I like NNAF because they point you to funds local to *you* that you may never have heard of. eggplant Jan 2016 #50
This is great. smokey nj Jan 2016 #52
By endorsing they made themselves a political organization. Autumn Jan 2016 #53
Indeed. They unnecessarily hurt the people who need them. smokey nj Jan 2016 #56
They have always stood above the fray and Democrats have always stood by them. Autumn Jan 2016 #60
That is the point those in this thread are missing davidpdx Jan 2016 #91
They should have stayed out of it marlakay Jan 2016 #62
I will still donate to them, but am disappointed AllyCat Jan 2016 #63
The connections go very deep. Clinton Global Initiative works closely with them. madfloridian Jan 2016 #64
I've supporterd them for years Plucketeer Jan 2016 #67
This would have made sense AFTER the primary... truebrit71 Jan 2016 #69
Which begs the question of why it was done. winter is coming Jan 2016 #77
MASSIVE FAIL on PP's part. They will pay for it.... Indepatriot Jan 2016 #70
I knew this would happen. liberalnarb Jan 2016 #72
I cancelled my monthly donation because PP didn't care enough to even poll us. onecaliberal Jan 2016 #75
I will always support PP and wish they had stayed out of it. mahina Jan 2016 #80
bakatadi's too! Akamai Jan 2016 #140
:) mahina Jan 2016 #144
I think Hillary is desperate. Bernblu Jan 2016 #82
It could be with her fall in the polls and PP's being wacked at by the right-wingers davidpdx Jan 2016 #92
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #84
Buh-bye! smokey nj Jan 2016 #85
Endorsing any candidate was a poor political decision. blackspade Jan 2016 #88
Yup! My view too. Like asking your child (as I used to do humorously), "Who do you love more? Me or Akamai Jan 2016 #141
Excellent Post... Thespian2 Jan 2016 #89
Someone posted this today... 840high Jan 2016 #94
What a bone headed move! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #105
It was a really dumb move. mnhtnbb Jan 2016 #106
I think most of the angst from Hillary supporters over any backlash is because they (astoundingly) djean111 Jan 2016 #108
If Warren endorsed Hillary tomorrow, I'd think she'd lost her mind. senz Jan 2016 #156
Interesting. They shot themselves in the foot with this one. peacebird Jan 2016 #109
Deleting comment... dorkzilla Jan 2016 #112
Reminds me when AARP got cozy with GW Bush and the Repubs. AARP is still paying for that. /nt NCjack Jan 2016 #116
I disagree with their endorsement, especially since they've never done this before, CrispyQ Jan 2016 #118
I'll side with the nurses for Bernie Geronimoe Jan 2016 #120
Seriously, you quote a group called "Rock the Sluts' Vote"? lark Jan 2016 #121
Why would I want my donations to possibly go to a candidate I don't support? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #143
PP just lost me weknowvino2 Jan 2016 #123
Sounds like someone has been promised a job in a Clinton administration fbc Jan 2016 #126
This is exactly the kind of bullcrap we are fighting. The PP leadership needs to be fired. nm rhett o rick Jan 2016 #134
They seem to corrupt every single thing they touch. senz Jan 2016 #157
Looks like they didn't learn about backlashes after Susan G. Koman Fawke Em Jan 2016 #132
Extraordinary ratfuck. joshcryer Jan 2016 #148
No, the ratfuck is that the Third Way types think the left can be manipulated into supporting djean111 Jan 2016 #158
What a bonehead move Android3.14 Jan 2016 #151
Kick. Autumn Jan 2016 #154
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Massive Backlash to the P...»Reply #8