Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zazen

(2,978 posts)
13. "DNC announces fundraising agreement with Clinton campaign"??
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:10 PM
Jan 2016

Maybe this has something to do with it . . . some sort of mixing of spending streams? At this point (and until about three weeks ago) it didn't seem that the DNC or any other mainstream outlet took Sanders seriously, so it wouldn't occur to them to worry about the DNC's agreement with anyone else.



From Politico in August.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/dnc-democratic-committee-hillary-clinton-fundraising-agreement-2016-121813

The document will enable the DNC and the campaign to conduct events and other fundraising activities together that will generate money for both entities. Clinton wouldn’t have access to the money unless and until she’s the nominee — but this is seen as an essential step for banking cash to counter what’s expected to be massive Republican spending next year.

. . . All 50 state parties were invited to join the agreement as well. Several had already pursued their own joint fundraising agreements with the Clinton campaign while the DNC had held off on signing — largely over disagreements over how the money would be able to be spent. The Clinton campaign, wary of management and structural problems at the DNC, insisted on a tight rein on spending.

. . . A DNC official said the money would build infrastructure to “to support whoever the eventual Democratic nominee is — as soon as there is a nominee. It will help the party make critical investments in technology, in voter outreach and in helping get out our message leading up to the general election in 2016.”

. . . The DNC says it’s pursuing similar agreements with the other Democratic primary campaigns, but so far, those haven’t materialized.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How do you spend money Against Dems? It must be common as it has its own column. libdem4life Jan 2016 #1
I think David Brock intends to show us this weekend with his new ageism smear. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #4
I take that to mean that the figure reflects money spent against a Dem opponent? libdem4life Jan 2016 #8
Yes, that is what it means. Sorry, I should have directly addressed your question. n/t JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #9
quote from web site explaining this--I think it's superPAC money? zazen Jan 2016 #2
Hm, I'm not sure that is an explanation per se. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #3
I mean, it's just "outside spending"--not what's described below. n/t zazen Jan 2016 #5
I agree, but so..? The point is that the data here shows party committee being used... JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #6
I didn't read it that way--it's "excluding party committee" n/t zazen Jan 2016 #7
Uh... JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #10
so why is her 3.3 million against Dems for "general," but "primary" is $713K? zazen Jan 2016 #11
You're right, it doesn't make much sense to classify the expenditures as for general election. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #12
"DNC announces fundraising agreement with Clinton campaign"?? zazen Jan 2016 #13
It is about >outside groups< spending. Look at Russ Feingold column for example emulatorloo Jan 2016 #14
I'm not sure, but you do have a point. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #15
between you and me I think opensecrets needs better writers! emulatorloo Jan 2016 #18
Unclear whart this means--what time period is this over, for starters? n/t eridani Jan 2016 #16
Only expenditures for the 2016 cycle. n/t JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #17
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Why has HRC's campaign sp...»Reply #13