Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

FBaggins

(28,713 posts)

6. No

Reply to ancianita (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 30, 2019, 01:07 PM

Apr 2019

Fighting a subpoena that tries to get your personal financial records is not witness tampering... nor would it be if you threatened to sue the bank if they released them.

If, OTOH, the courts decided not to quash the subpoena and you threatened them in some other way (say... hinting that you won't approve their next merger)... then it would be witness tampering.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING NEWS: TRUMP TRIES TO BLOCK SUBPOENAS, CAUSING TOP DEMOCRATS TO CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT [View all] real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 OP

Biden called for impeachment as well... Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #1

Isn't it Witness Tampering for Trump to try to block info from Deutschebank and Capital One? ancianita Apr 2019 #2

Actually, this is another count of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE by Trump... real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #4

No FBaggins Apr 2019 #6

Interesting. Thanks. ancianita Apr 2019 #7

WELL, RECOMMEND THIS BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! real Cannabis calm May 2019 #25

?? ancianita May 2019 #26

K&R murielm99 Apr 2019 #3

Title is unsupported by the linked articles FBaggins Apr 2019 #5

Indeed. It is quite misleading tymorial Apr 2019 #21

this doesn't belong in the Primaries section. TeamPooka Apr 2019 #8

I am simply following advice of the D.U. Moderator: real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #11

Wtf is this doing in Primaries? jberryhill Apr 2019 #9

Ignore the title FBaggins Apr 2019 #10

It probably would have worked better as two articles... real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #12

They probably assumed that your original title was legit FBaggins Apr 2019 #13

You mean it is "false" in your opinion, correct? real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #14

As for your other "opinion" read this: real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #15

Already responded to that in #5 FBaggins Apr 2019 #17

Nope FBaggins Apr 2019 #16

are you attempting to claim that subpoenas are not "FOLLOW-UP PROBES?" real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #18

Sigh. The age of the link is not all that makes something "breaking news" FBaggins Apr 2019 #19

You might consider reading the dates, times and copy, before an unusual amount of criticism. real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #20

As for ALL the critics; thanks for supplying nearly 2,200 readers to news that deserves attention... real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #22

For the record: the original OP began 9:16 AM and locked 9:47 AM w/ 21 recs. real Cannabis calm Apr 2019 #23

what's up with this typical O.P? real Cannabis calm May 2019 #24

REAL news is that EVERYONE should Google, to see what is still online, since you last read "IT" Jeffersons Ghost May 2019 #27

Biden: If Trump blocks investigations, Congress has no choice but to impeach him Cha May 2019 #28