Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: BERNIE SANDERS CALLS OUT ANTI-MEDICARE FOR ALL 'FRONT GROUP' [View all]SidDithers
(44,333 posts)28. And the Canada Health Act wasn't passed until 1984...
22 years after Tommy Douglas introduced universal care in Saskatchewan.
Canadian medicare wasn't rolled out nationwide. It began in a single province, and took more than two decades to be formalized into a national program.
Which state is going to step up to be the first to implement single-payer, universal care for its citizens? When one state does so, the dominoes may begin to fall.
Sid
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's been in Washington for 28 years, why hasn't he been able to accomplish this for the People?
George II
May 2019
#33
CHIP and the ACA are accomplishments that actually got affordable health care to people.
ehrnst
May 2019
#35
I agree, the debates will be decisive & once they're over, and the primary election is decided...
InAbLuEsTaTe
May 2019
#110
I don't like Medicare for all. It would cost me a fortune to cover my family...and we have
Demsrule86
May 2019
#6
I pay $300.00 per month with copays for doctor visits and a $4000.00 out of pocket which
Demsrule86
May 2019
#13
Too many advocates for Medicare For All aren't aware of how the current Medicare system is....
George II
May 2019
#25
I have looked into it as my sis in law is on it...it won't work here and if we try,
Demsrule86
May 2019
#29
The first state won't be Vermont, they tried then realized that it would cost way too much.
George II
May 2019
#39
I was specifically asking about the for profit "health" insurance industry but if
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#88
Any group that includes ins. cos. does NOT have the people's interest at heart.
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#23
The vast majority of countries with UHC use a hybrid. But apparently that's heresy. (nt)
ehrnst
May 2019
#42
I Know...and it only because Sanders insists on it. You tell supporters the issues with it but
Demsrule86
May 2019
#45
I was right: There are more single payer systems in dev. countries than other systems.
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#62
Medicare Advantage plans are not Gov.Medicare. They are private health insurance supplemental plans.
YOHABLO
May 2019
#101
Interesting that those who espouse "Medicare for All" tout all the countries that....
George II
May 2019
#56
My hubs had surgery a couple of weeks ago...spinal . He was sent home early...too
Demsrule86
May 2019
#37
Any proposal that does NOT include insurance companies will cost much, much more.
George II
May 2019
#43
It wasn't a "demand" it was a request and the for profit "health" insurance industry
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#70
All caps were used because my questions were relevant to the OP despite your protestations
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#82
My questions might seem like a "demand" if one is suffering from cognitive dissonance,
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#86
They made enough in profits to spend 23 million dollars in lobbying and that's just
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#93
The profit margin of the healthcare insurance industry is lower than almost any other industry.....
George II
May 2019
#94
It makes no difference there should be no profit on the peoples health care from an industry
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#95
If there is no profit at all, even minimal, what's the point of being in business at all? And....
George II
May 2019
#120
"insurance giant Blue Cross Blue Shield" is a consortium of local non-profit associations
ucrdem
May 2019
#96
Blue Cross Blue Shield is a consortium that owns for profit "health" insurance
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#97
I don't know why you believe Blue Cross Blue Shield having a "non-profit" status means they care
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#102
Insofar as you're speaking of non-profit as the be all in determining the good
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#104
Actually, with his record as a parent, he probably wouldn't want to open that door
LongtimeAZDem
May 2019
#122