Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: BERNIE SANDERS CALLS OUT ANTI-MEDICARE FOR ALL 'FRONT GROUP' [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)64. No, you are not right on a few things.
Single payer is a type of universal care/coverage.
Correct.
But the one the majority of the 33 developed countries use is the single payer system. There are some that are a mandate system, like Germany, as well.
Incorrect. There are far fewer countries that use single payer (abolishing other plans -hence the name 'single payer') than use multiple payer systems to acheive universal health care.
Which Countries Have Single-Payer Health Systems?
Fewer than many people think. Most European countries either never had or no longer have single-payer systems. Most are basically what we call social insurance systems, said Gerard Anderson, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who has studied international health systems. Social insurance programs ensure that almost everyone is covered. They are taxpayer-funded but are not necessarily run by the government.
Germany, for example, has 135 sickness funds, which are essentially private, nonprofit insurance plans that negotiate prices with health care providers. So you have 135 funds to choose from, Anderson said.
Nearby, Switzerland and the Netherlands require their residents to have private insurance (just like the Affordable Care Act does), with subsidies to help those who cannot otherwise afford coverage.
And while conservatives in the United States often use Great Britains National Health Service as the poster child for a socialized system, there are many private insurance options available to residents there, too.
Among the countries that have true single-payer systems, Anderson lists only two Canada and Taiwan.
Fewer than many people think. Most European countries either never had or no longer have single-payer systems. Most are basically what we call social insurance systems, said Gerard Anderson, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who has studied international health systems. Social insurance programs ensure that almost everyone is covered. They are taxpayer-funded but are not necessarily run by the government.
Germany, for example, has 135 sickness funds, which are essentially private, nonprofit insurance plans that negotiate prices with health care providers. So you have 135 funds to choose from, Anderson said.
Nearby, Switzerland and the Netherlands require their residents to have private insurance (just like the Affordable Care Act does), with subsidies to help those who cannot otherwise afford coverage.
And while conservatives in the United States often use Great Britains National Health Service as the poster child for a socialized system, there are many private insurance options available to residents there, too.
Among the countries that have true single-payer systems, Anderson lists only two Canada and Taiwan.
https://khn.org/news/democratic-candidates-debate-single-payer-but-what-does-that-mean/
You just want to argue. But the facts are the facts. I refuse to go down the rabbit hole with you. Go ahead and continue to argue with everyone. But arguing against hard facts is difficult. Truth and facts are what matter.
Someone correcting you on the facts and not backing down when you double down and go on the defensive isn't a "rabbit hole" except for the person who is on the defensive for being corrected. That defensive posture is what could more accurately be described as 'just wanting to argue."
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's been in Washington for 28 years, why hasn't he been able to accomplish this for the People?
George II
May 2019
#33
CHIP and the ACA are accomplishments that actually got affordable health care to people.
ehrnst
May 2019
#35
I agree, the debates will be decisive & once they're over, and the primary election is decided...
InAbLuEsTaTe
May 2019
#110
I don't like Medicare for all. It would cost me a fortune to cover my family...and we have
Demsrule86
May 2019
#6
I pay $300.00 per month with copays for doctor visits and a $4000.00 out of pocket which
Demsrule86
May 2019
#13
Too many advocates for Medicare For All aren't aware of how the current Medicare system is....
George II
May 2019
#25
I have looked into it as my sis in law is on it...it won't work here and if we try,
Demsrule86
May 2019
#29
The first state won't be Vermont, they tried then realized that it would cost way too much.
George II
May 2019
#39
I was specifically asking about the for profit "health" insurance industry but if
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#88
Any group that includes ins. cos. does NOT have the people's interest at heart.
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#23
The vast majority of countries with UHC use a hybrid. But apparently that's heresy. (nt)
ehrnst
May 2019
#42
I Know...and it only because Sanders insists on it. You tell supporters the issues with it but
Demsrule86
May 2019
#45
I was right: There are more single payer systems in dev. countries than other systems.
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#62
Medicare Advantage plans are not Gov.Medicare. They are private health insurance supplemental plans.
YOHABLO
May 2019
#101
Interesting that those who espouse "Medicare for All" tout all the countries that....
George II
May 2019
#56
My hubs had surgery a couple of weeks ago...spinal . He was sent home early...too
Demsrule86
May 2019
#37
Any proposal that does NOT include insurance companies will cost much, much more.
George II
May 2019
#43
It wasn't a "demand" it was a request and the for profit "health" insurance industry
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#70
All caps were used because my questions were relevant to the OP despite your protestations
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#82
My questions might seem like a "demand" if one is suffering from cognitive dissonance,
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#86
They made enough in profits to spend 23 million dollars in lobbying and that's just
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#93
The profit margin of the healthcare insurance industry is lower than almost any other industry.....
George II
May 2019
#94
It makes no difference there should be no profit on the peoples health care from an industry
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#95
If there is no profit at all, even minimal, what's the point of being in business at all? And....
George II
May 2019
#120
"insurance giant Blue Cross Blue Shield" is a consortium of local non-profit associations
ucrdem
May 2019
#96
Blue Cross Blue Shield is a consortium that owns for profit "health" insurance
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#97
I don't know why you believe Blue Cross Blue Shield having a "non-profit" status means they care
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#102
Insofar as you're speaking of non-profit as the be all in determining the good
Uncle Joe
May 2019
#104
Actually, with his record as a parent, he probably wouldn't want to open that door
LongtimeAZDem
May 2019
#122