Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Kirsten Gillibrand's Failure to Launch [View all]
Shes tough and smart. The New York senator seemed like a top-tier 2020 contender. So why is she crashing?
By TIM ALBERTA May 31, 2019
HAMPTON, New HampshireKirsten Gillibrand is only asking for a dollar.
Its not that she couldnt use more money. In the first quarter of 2019, the junior senator from New York raised just $3 million for her presidential campaign, the weakest haul of the six senators running at that time and arguably one of the most disappointing totals of anyone in the sprawling Democratic field. Given her anemic polling since entering the race, Gillibrands feeble fundraising performance fanned skepticism about her viability to earn a nomination that Democrats believe will require close to $100 million in hard money raised. But at this point, Gillibrand isnt focused on winning the primary. Shes worried about surviving the next few months.
Despite a soaring national profile in the U.S. Senate, Gillibrand has failed to achieve liftoff as a presidential prospect. She has not broken 2 percent in a single national poll since officially declaring her candidacy in mid-March, and her 0.4 percent average in the RealClearPolitics aggregate of surveys places her behind the likes of Julián Castro, Tulsi Gabbard and even geeky long shot Andrew Yang.
Her bigger problem is fundraising. To secure a spot in the first double-header of Democratic primary debates in late June, candidates must meet two thresholds: surpassing 1 percent in three recognized national polls and collecting 65,000 unique campaign contributions. Gillibrand has checked the first box, however unimpressively. Yet the second mission remains unaccomplished. With the debates closing inand with even quixotic candidates such as self-help guru Marianne Williamson hitting the 65,000-donor markGillibrand is under the gun. The Democratic National Committee is limiting the total number of participants to 20. She could (and likely will) qualify by meeting the polling threshold only. But given the late gusher of contenders entering the fray, her place on stage can be guaranteed only by growing her donor ranksand quickly.
more
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/05/31/kirsten-gillibrand-2020-democratic-campaign-president-primary-podcast-227032
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But, as others pointed out - Harris and others conveniently hide behind her
question everything
May 2019
#24
I'd like to think so. Doesn't always happen. But this time it did. I thought it would. Good.nt
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#31
I doubt she'd be doing any better even without the Franken travesty on her resume.
BlueStater
May 2019
#22
Odd way to look at it, as that is not how money gets distributed to the needy...
Hekate
May 2019
#26
Good riddance. Who gave her $3M? Is her family that large? (Franken says "Bye!," Gillibrand) nt
Honeycombe8
May 2019
#27