Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri May 31, 2019, 09:55 AM May 2019

Kirsten Gillibrand's Failure to Launch [View all]


She’s tough and smart. The New York senator seemed like a top-tier 2020 contender. So why is she crashing?

By TIM ALBERTA May 31, 2019

HAMPTON, New Hampshire—Kirsten Gillibrand is only asking for a dollar.

It’s not that she couldn’t use more money. In the first quarter of 2019, the junior senator from New York raised just $3 million for her presidential campaign, the weakest haul of the six senators running at that time and arguably one of the most disappointing totals of anyone in the sprawling Democratic field. Given her anemic polling since entering the race, Gillibrand’s feeble fundraising performance fanned skepticism about her viability to earn a nomination that Democrats believe will require close to $100 million in hard money raised. But at this point, Gillibrand isn’t focused on winning the primary. She’s worried about surviving the next few months.

Despite a soaring national profile in the U.S. Senate, Gillibrand has failed to achieve liftoff as a presidential prospect. She has not broken 2 percent in a single national poll since officially declaring her candidacy in mid-March, and her 0.4 percent average in the RealClearPolitics aggregate of surveys places her behind the likes of Julián Castro, Tulsi Gabbard and even geeky long shot Andrew Yang.

Her bigger problem is fundraising. To secure a spot in the first double-header of Democratic primary debates in late June, candidates must meet two thresholds: surpassing 1 percent in three recognized national polls and collecting 65,000 unique campaign contributions. Gillibrand has checked the first box, however unimpressively. Yet the second mission remains unaccomplished. With the debates closing in—and with even quixotic candidates such as self-help guru Marianne Williamson hitting the 65,000-donor mark—Gillibrand is under the gun. The Democratic National Committee is limiting the total number of participants to 20. She could (and likely will) qualify by meeting the polling threshold only. But given the late gusher of contenders entering the fray, her place on stage can be guaranteed only by growing her donor ranks—and quickly.

more
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/05/31/kirsten-gillibrand-2020-democratic-campaign-president-primary-podcast-227032
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Franken effect. LakeArenal May 2019 #1
I was going to say the same thing. Well said. blueinredohio May 2019 #5
Yeah, pretty much all the others got a pass. MrsCoffee May 2019 #13
Yes. Harris and Booker. LakeArenal May 2019 #17
Someone has to. MicaelS May 2019 #42
She chose to be the leader, thought it would help her, it didn't. nt USALiberal May 2019 #43
She chose to fall Roger Stone's SUCKER BET and expects accolades for it. nt Baltimike Jun 2019 #67
She initiated and led the charge. nuff said MoonRiver Jun 2019 #58
By 5 minutes? Trumpocalypse Jun 2019 #61
She owns it wellst0nev0ter Jun 2019 #62
The article said: PatSeg May 2019 #19
I think she is an excellent Senator but not a great public speaker EveHammond13 May 2019 #29
Definitely not inspirational PatSeg May 2019 #36
And it was someone in her OWN camp wellst0nev0ter Jun 2019 #63
Ah yes PatSeg Jun 2019 #66
This! zeusdogmom May 2019 #40
I'm never getting over that. Butterflylady May 2019 #21
Ni moi non plus! Mme. Defarge Jun 2019 #54
Yep. Gillibrand, Harris, Warren, Sanders, Booker. But not Klobuchar. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #28
Exactly why his removal should have been by constituents. LakeArenal Jun 2019 #50
Yes kimbutgar May 2019 #30
Yawn!!! brooklynite May 2019 #48
Yawn... LakeArenal Jun 2019 #51
...and the majority is always right... brooklynite Jun 2019 #53
Not at all. But on this post it was LakeArenal Jun 2019 #55
Yes we are wellst0nev0ter Jun 2019 #64
+1 Celerity Jun 2019 #70
It's more than that Trumpocalypse Jun 2019 #59
I also hold Gillibrand responsible for this Gothmog Jun 2019 #68
This field is too big for generic candidates BeyondGeography May 2019 #2
Karma comes back to thump her, not just for railroading Al Franken out mtnsnake May 2019 #3
I suspect that she's alienated a lot of powerful people. yardwork May 2019 #20
Yup LoveMyCali May 2019 #44
She helped Republicans achieve something they couldn't do on their own dalton99a May 2019 #4
Will be happy to see her leave the stage. Polly Hennessey May 2019 #6
For anyone who hasn't figured it out yet, FoxNewsSucks May 2019 #7
I agree PatSeg May 2019 #37
I agree snowybirdie May 2019 #39
Easy, most people, including me, just don't like her..n/t monmouth4 May 2019 #8
My impression is that her candidacy is more about her ambition vlyons May 2019 #9
yes to all points. n/t MBS May 2019 #15
Maybe she thinks the "Franken effect" is unfair. hay rick May 2019 #10
Exactly. LakeArenal May 2019 #11
Why is she crashing? Little Star May 2019 #12
But we can still vote for Sanders, Warren, Booker, Bennet, Harris..... brooklynite May 2019 #49
"Woe is me" wellst0nev0ter Jun 2019 #65
Al Franken was the most dangerous Democrat in the Senate, to the GOP. mn9driver May 2019 #14
My thoughts exactly Blue Owl May 2019 #16
But, as others pointed out - Harris and others conveniently hide behind her question everything May 2019 #24
I will never get over what happened to Al Franken. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #33
Sounds good. Klobuchar is great. LakeArenal May 2019 #46
When someone builds their career.... quickesst May 2019 #18
I'd like to think so. Doesn't always happen. But this time it did. I thought it would. Good.nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #31
As in the current Prezdent. LakeArenal May 2019 #47
I doubt she'd be doing any better even without the Franken travesty on her resume. BlueStater May 2019 #22
She's one of the few who had some name recognition. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #32
On the other hand $100 million to be elected question everything May 2019 #23
Odd way to look at it, as that is not how money gets distributed to the needy... Hekate May 2019 #26
I hope she is not giving up her Senate seat for this presidential run... Hekate May 2019 #25
Good riddance. Who gave her $3M? Is her family that large? (Franken says "Bye!," Gillibrand) nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #27
"Soaring National Profile in the U.S. Senate?" DarthDem May 2019 #34
This too from Gillibrand bunny planet May 2019 #35
She never seemed like a "top-tier" candidate to me. MineralMan May 2019 #38
Agreed. I am quite happy with her as one of my Senators, but... TreasonousBastard Jun 2019 #57
So sorry Senator Franken that you disappeared from the US Senate. trueblue2007 May 2019 #41
Franken could have been a presidential candidate this time around, if this didn't happen to him. LisaL May 2019 #45
That was why Gillibrand and others wanted him out of the way. DavidDvorkin Jun 2019 #60
Senator Gillibrand, you made a choice. no_hypocrisy Jun 2019 #52
I read that article customerserviceguy Jun 2019 #56
Lots of people don't get it. LakeArenal Jun 2019 #69
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Kirsten Gillibrand's Fail...»Reply #0