Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Is David Axelrod an Ageist? [View all]dawg day
(7,947 posts)3. Many of us like Axelrod who are over 60 worry about older candidates-- and ourselves
We shouldn't forget there's an actual constitutional rule against younger candidates (under 35). So let's not pretend that age isn't an issue recognized by the founders. In fact, in those days, the life expectancy was limited, so maybe they didn't need to consider the problem of a truly aged president.
Many people live to be 85 with no physical or mental disability. But those of us approaching that epoch of existence have noticed with our parents and friends that you simply can't predict. You can assume a 30-year-old is going to retain his/her intelligence and health for decades -- most do-- but with someone over 70-- you just can't know. Harsh but true. It's a very sad truth. I'm sorry- fearing this myself.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I saw that post and was tempted to alert, but figured it would catch up to him sooner or later.
George II
Jun 2019
#16
Many of us like Axelrod who are over 60 worry about older candidates-- and ourselves
dawg day
Jun 2019
#3
Considering age is not necessarily ageism. I don't question Biden's ability to execute his duties
tymorial
Jun 2019
#8
The older the car, the more likely the breakdown. The older the house, the more likely the problems.
Midnight Writer
Jun 2019
#14
I'm 60 and I've thought about this as well. I do not think it means we're bashing anyone,
PatrickforO
Jun 2019
#21
Well, at least his hair wouldn't that th white during his tenure in office as typically
tblue37
Jun 2019
#22
No Axelrod is not.You are again making this all about Biden. Still nothing about your guy Booker?
Hekate
Jun 2019
#23
It is an excellent observation. In fact in this OP about "age", he only singles out Biden, but
still_one
Jun 2019
#31
I agree, and mentioned that directly to the OP in a separate post. I also think it is ageist.
still_one
Jun 2019
#43
Well, I was concerned about Biden's age & long record *before* he entered the race...
Hekate
Jun 2019
#44
I understand your point, and you are using age as the focal point, but regardless of age, what you
still_one
Jun 2019
#46
"If you are unsteady on the campaign trail that is going to intensify those questions."
jalan48
Jun 2019
#27
I think a lot of Biden's gaffes are not gaffes. Sharing with Obama that passage of the ACA is a BFD
Hekate
Jun 2019
#45
Not taking the bait. You don't do a thing to rep your guy. Booker? Tell us why you support him.
emmaverybo
Jun 2019
#29
Another negative post about Biden by the OP. The OP only singles out Biden with the "age" problem
still_one
Jun 2019
#30
You are so wrong it's embarrassing. I am undecided after the Hyde amendment incident. Are you
still_one
Jun 2019
#40
The question is someone physicially and mentally able to do the job. People age differently. Some
still_one
Jun 2019
#34
I'd say that in those statements he's both ageist and thoughtless, since he
highplainsdem
Jun 2019
#37