Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)

34. I like Warren because she is inexhaustible as a campaigner.

Reply to JI7 (Reply #33)

Thu Jun 13, 2019, 07:45 PM

Jun 2019

We can't have a 2020 nominee who spends large amounts of time off the campaign trail. Trump loves adoring crowds, he will likely be doing lots of stops before the droolers that come to watch him. We need a campaigner that makes him look tired, so far Warren is the only one showing that instinct.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden's campaign is showing some deep cracks in Iowa [View all] pnwmom Jun 2019 OP

It's an editorial opinion saidsimplesimon Jun 2019 #1

I just added the 4th paragraph, saying he had a 5% lead there, compared to 16% nationally. pnwmom Jun 2019 #2

Please focus DownriverDem Jun 2019 #15

Several of the Democrats could beat Trump and know how the system works. We'll have a better idea pnwmom Jun 2019 #20

the difference? 24 candidates to choose from, not 2 or 3 nt msongs Jun 2019 #3

Just a reminder, the Iowa caucuses are in February jberryhill Jun 2019 #4

He's lucky he has that time because he still has a lot of work to do there. pnwmom Jun 2019 #6

Yeah, he might go for Tom Harkin's 76.55% Iowa Caucus win in 1992 jberryhill Jun 2019 #10

I really DownriverDem Jun 2019 #16

Ah, a veteran of the Hillary 2008 campaign jberryhill Jun 2019 #21

The problem is you won't know who that it is until election day. marylandblue Jun 2019 #24

I am an optimist. saidsimplesimon Jun 2019 #8

Deep cracks? I am not seeing deep cracks based on the editorial's information. Just that Iowa, emmaverybo Jun 2019 #5

What a waste DownriverDem Jun 2019 #18

I sure agree. Feel some should self-eliminate and now. nt emmaverybo Jun 2019 #26

The "Hillarying" of Biden will continue adnauseum. Pathwalker Jun 2019 #7

And like me, I hated what they did to Secretary Clinton. redstatebluegirl Jun 2019 #14

For sure DownriverDem Jun 2019 #19

They seem to be coming from the same few posters. cwydro Jun 2019 #25

Noticed that. And persistent at it. nt emmaverybo Jun 2019 #29

Perhaps they're unaware there's a "Biden Pile-On" thread! cwydro Jun 2019 #30

Amen. emmaverybo Jun 2019 #27

This opinion is pretty flawed. Drunken Irishman Jun 2019 #9

VP Biden announced 7 weeks ago today.. soooo Peacetrain Jun 2019 #11

Still months to go before the caucuses, aren't there? MineralMan Jun 2019 #12

RealClear's average is based on four polls, only one of which came after Biden's announcement.... George II Jun 2019 #13

Some people don't believe in math nt LibFarmer Jun 2019 #22

Henry Olsen is a conservative... SidDithers Jun 2019 #17

Frankly, I've not really seen much of a campaign from Biden in Iowa at all. progressoid Jun 2019 #23

K&R Kurt V. Jun 2019 #28

Any points Iowa are ok. Yes it helps with coverage and, maybe, momentum but spend money in Primaries underpants Jun 2019 #31

let's go Joe ! still_one Jun 2019 #32

Biden could lose Iowa. mostly becsuse he doesn't like to campaign JI7 Jun 2019 #33

I like Warren because she is inexhaustible as a campaigner. Blue_true Jun 2019 #34

I know IA is first and winning can set a candidate up going into NH... VarryOn Jun 2019 #35