Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

emmaverybo

(8,144 posts)
18. These aren't judged by academic debate standards. Sometimes the sharper debater conveys the
Fri Jun 14, 2019, 02:35 PM
Jun 2019

impression he or she suffers a superiority complex. Maybe primaries are different.

As to the general, I recall Reagan, according to popular and media perception, winning a debate in which he gave a rambling, near incoherent final statement, looking utterly lost, and Bush, such an obvious dullard against the intellectually superior Gore, seen as the better debater in what must have been a sympathy call.

It is said that the public doesn’t pay a lot of attention to policy, more to a general impression they
get from a candidate’s demeanor, warm or cold, animated or sluggish, engaging or aloof. Not sure
this conventional wisdom applies to Democratic debates this cycle.

But I wouldn't bet on the most articulate, fluent, policy-savy debater winning this round.
I wouldn’t count out Biden. Although I don’t expect to see the moral knock-out young Senator Biden scored against Alexander Haig, cutting his cagey obfuscations to shreds, he has an emotional presence and authority that can outshine more deft debaters.



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Drat. I wanted to see her vs. Bernie. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2019 #1
I agree, I think she would be formidable against him in a debate. redstatebluegirl Jun 2019 #13
We will. :) Notably, SHE LEADS on the first night, Hortensis Jun 2019 #21
Hmmmm ... how are these decisions made? Who makes them and how? KPN Jun 2019 #2
I am guessing whatever match ups the media thinks will draw the most viewers. Thomas Hurt Jun 2019 #3
mostly random qazplm135 Jun 2019 #5
The idea was to split the poll leaders in two groups question everything Jun 2019 #6
I also put how it was done in post 14 OKNancy Jun 2019 #15
I don't understand this split but . . . peggysue2 Jun 2019 #4
Looks like Tom Perez may be stacking the deck for Biden INdemo Jun 2019 #7
Seems to me this hurts Biden and helps Warren marylandblue Jun 2019 #8
Hmm JustAnotherGen Jun 2019 #11
Annnnd here we go with the kooky conspiracy theories. BannonsLiver Jun 2019 #10
wtf ? stonecutter357 Jun 2019 #12
see post 14. OKNancy Jun 2019 #16
OFFS nolabear Jun 2019 #17
If he wanted to do that, I was thinking he'd put Joe up against the bullwinkle428 Jun 2019 #23
I actually think this works in both Warren and Beto's advantage Indygram Jun 2019 #9
This was how it was decided. THere was no "stacking the deck" for anyone OKNancy Jun 2019 #14
Yeahbut....the fact that the DNC was involved invariably elicits comments like some we're seeing. George II Jun 2019 #19
Invariably no matter what. Those you're talking about Hortensis Jun 2019 #22
These aren't judged by academic debate standards. Sometimes the sharper debater conveys the emmaverybo Jun 2019 #18
For the first debate I think it's good that the top two contenders are on separate nights. SouthernProgressive Jun 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Biden, Sanders, Buttigieg...»Reply #18