Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: I love Kamala, but I'M IN FOR GOVERNOR JAY INSLEE [View all]NNadir
(38,152 posts)...is based on 30 years of study of the scientific literature, the primary scientific literature.
This includes quite literally thousands of papers on so called "renewable energy" including many that are quite disturbing to me as an environmentalist. For just one example out of hundreds, there is the appalling and terrifying broad discussion of increasing the efficiency of solar cells using cesium hexaiodoplumbate perovskites, for example. Distributed energy using distributed lead is simply an insane idea.
It seems to me that people advocating bat and bird grinders in the sky have no idea how steel, aluminium and neodymium iron boride magnets are made, or, for that matter how long the devices last before becoming landfill.
I by contrast have carefully analyzed the wind turbine database provided by the energy agency of that offshore oil and gas drilling hellhole Denmark.
I posted this analysis here.
I don't know what "experts" I am alleged to have quoted in this thread, but I have certainly provided many hundreds of links to scientific papers in my writings here, which have guided my own thinking. For the record, I used to endorse so called "renewable energy" but I changed my mind.
Also the paper I most frequently link here in my posts and comments is the open source 2012 publication in Envir. Sci Tech coauthored by the most prominent climate scientist in the US, Jim Hansen.
You may define for yourself who and who is not an expert, but my definition is sure to differ, since you define a trillion dollar industry, the solar industry, as immature. It is failed as a climate strategy, and is useless, but it is not immature.
The solar cell was invented in 1954.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden