Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

tishaLA

(14,782 posts)
16. Yes, segregationists whose raison d'etre was to dehumanize black folks
Sun Jul 7, 2019, 07:20 PM
Jul 2019

are probably best left in the past instead of commenting on their "civility."


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a losing issue for you Kamala and for the Democratic Party redstateblues Jul 2019 #1
She's giving them ammunition calguy Jul 2019 #4
Curious ... does she find anything that Trump says about what he was doing RHMerriman Jul 2019 #31
Kamala is out to win nomination and must knockout Biden at140 Jul 2019 #51
and Warren needs to step up her game AlexSFCA Jul 2019 #52
Yes, front runner receives the most flak at140 Jul 2019 #61
Funny, I thought the point was to win the election in November. RHMerriman Jul 2019 #53
Cart before the Horse! at140 Jul 2019 #60
Allies couldn't win in 1945 if the Soviets were defeated in 1942... RHMerriman Jul 2019 #66
And your point is? at140 Jul 2019 #69
Focus on the real enemy? RHMerriman Jul 2019 #76
Too early for that, the prize is just too important at140 Jul 2019 #91
Set aside personal ambition in favor of the common good? RHMerriman Jul 2019 #106
Nice concept, but rarely has happened before! at140 Jul 2019 #108
Given the stakes, perhaps it should? RHMerriman Jul 2019 #110
Accept the reality as it exists at140 Jul 2019 #113
Trust me, there's one Democratic incumbent I won't be voting for next time around... RHMerriman Jul 2019 #114
I don't have too much use for any Democrat who refuses to look oasis Jul 2019 #109
You are not alone... RHMerriman Jul 2019 #111
It is not necessary to knockout someone else treestar Jul 2019 #81
How many opponents Hillary had during primaries? at140 Jul 2019 #90
Fight for it on their merits treestar Jul 2019 #96
+1 treestar Jul 2019 #8
K&R onetexan Jul 2019 #57
Yes indeed. And this is not a good thing. Owl Jul 2019 #87
A lot of folk must believe that EffieBlack Jul 2019 #88
I saw her answer this morning on MSNBC. Yes, we can't rewrite history, but isn't she expecting... George II Jul 2019 #2
How so? bluewater Jul 2019 #3
She expects him to believe her hard luck story. ucrdem Jul 2019 #5
"she didn't desegregate Thousand Oaks elementary. It was never segregated." bluewater Jul 2019 #9
Thousand Oaks had a 2.1% AA student population the year before the busing program started. ucrdem Jul 2019 #11
You made a statement that the elementary school was never segregated. bluewater Jul 2019 #13
It wasn't segregated. It had a mixed student population. ucrdem Jul 2019 #17
So you can't provide actual data? bluewater Jul 2019 #21
Berkeley schools were never segregated. If you think they were, prove it. nt ucrdem Jul 2019 #22
Thanks! Cha Jul 2019 #24
Heya Cha! ucrdem Jul 2019 #25
Go Cha Jul 2019 #26
LOL ucrdem Jul 2019 #29
That's not how it works. YOU are the one making the claims. bluewater Jul 2019 #27
See below. ucrdem Jul 2019 #28
I was wrong -- it was 3% at Thousand Oaks in 1963, before Harris was even born ucrdem Jul 2019 #23
"while other schools had a black population as high as 97%" wtf! bluewater Jul 2019 #30
There was no systematic segregation and no lawsuit against it. There was unequal distribution ucrdem Jul 2019 #32
So you were wrong and are now moving the goal posts? bluewater Jul 2019 #33
In the context of busing, there was no determination of systematic segregation. ucrdem Jul 2019 #34
Your claim that Berkley schools were never segregated was wrong. bluewater Jul 2019 #36
Show me the consent decree compelling Berkeley to desegregate and you win. ucrdem Jul 2019 #37
The courts didn't get involved because, unlike many other cities Berkeley desegregated voluntarily StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #40
The school was still segregated when Harris started attending it. bluewater Jul 2019 #42
Per NYT the school was 40.2 percent AA the year before Harris got there: ucrdem Jul 2019 #45
The school was desegregated between 1968 and 1969 thanks to the busing program. bluewater Jul 2019 #54
It was at 40.2% AA per NYT, 37% per Sac Bee, the year before she started in 1970. nt ucrdem Jul 2019 #49
Again, Desegregated between 1968 and 1969 thanks to the busing program bluewater Jul 2019 #55
So she desegregated an unsegregated school while attending Montessori. ucrdem Jul 2019 #56
Facts are stubborn things, Harris helped desegregate her school. bluewater Jul 2019 #62
Yes thank you. It appears to have been a great success! ucrdem Jul 2019 #43
If you knew Berkeley, 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #63
Exactly. ucrdem Jul 2019 #67
No. No. No StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #73
By the way-those predominantly black schools had white students. 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #115
Very good point. ucrdem Jul 2019 #116
Thousand Oaks was 40.2% AA in 1969, the year BEFORE Harris was first bused there: ucrdem Jul 2019 #38
Harris did help desegregate it. It's explained in your own article. bluewater Jul 2019 #44
It was fully integrated the year before she got there. ucrdem Jul 2019 #46
a WHOLE year? A distinction without a difference? bluewater Jul 2019 #47
I'd call 40.2% fully integrated. YMMV. nt ucrdem Jul 2019 #48
Because of the busing program she was a participant in. lol bluewater Jul 2019 #50
"It was fully integrated the year before she got there" StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #58
I am at a loss for words. bluewater Jul 2019 #64
It was *already* integrated. But more accurately ucrdem Jul 2019 #68
Segregation needn't be deliberate and systematic in order to exist and to be unconstitutional StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #71
It was never segregated at all if you want to get semantic. ucrdem Jul 2019 #74
As I said, you don't know enough about this to lecture anyone about "bottom lines" or anything else StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #75
Look in any dictionary.nt ucrdem Jul 2019 #77
Thanks for the definitive data. Now you're being told that R B Garr Jul 2019 #78
Thank you. I thought when she said it that it sounded peculiar ucrdem Jul 2019 #80
If that were the case Chitown Kev Jul 2019 #79
Well he is not to talk about things treestar Jul 2019 #10
I rather not joke about what 'those old segregationists" actually did. It's not funny. bluewater Jul 2019 #12
Yes, segregationists whose raison d'etre was to dehumanize black folks tishaLA Jul 2019 #16
Berkeley isn't in Mississippi. nt ucrdem Jul 2019 #19
Where did Sen Eastland hail from and who was it that tishaLA Jul 2019 #20
They are not going to go away treestar Jul 2019 #82
How is asking someone if think they were wrong about something in the past "rewriting history"? StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #7
She will. ucrdem Jul 2019 #6
I'm in a world of hurt in anticipation of another Trump term. oasis Jul 2019 #14
Please Kamala, it's "between him and me" not "he and I." CTyankee Jul 2019 #15
All of what you said tishaLA Jul 2019 #18
Drives me crazy when educated people do that. cwydro Jul 2019 #39
That made my eyes roll back in my head. StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #72
Must've been a odd prosecutor whistler162 Jul 2019 #35
The Innocence Project has been going after Harris' prosecutions for years. ucrdem Jul 2019 #41
Just ask her why she could not advocate for victims of church abuse. 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #59
Harris has a lot of skeletons that will make her an unviable candidate in a general election. Princetonian Jul 2019 #83
Yep.She gets the nom, it will be endless. And it will smell. 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #84
Something will smell, alright EffieBlack Jul 2019 #86
They will be shredding her over the Willie Brown machine. And not just because she dated him. 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #89
Uh-hunh. Nice research about Willie Brown - (that has nothing to do with Harris) EffieBlack Jul 2019 #92
I really did not have to look far for info. I was born in the Bay Area. 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #95
Don't fall for the ratfuck EffieBlack Jul 2019 #85
Disappointing reaction, but not surprising, given what I've learned about her recently. highplainsdem Jul 2019 #65
What have you learned? nt Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #93
Hang it up tirebiter Jul 2019 #70
I like Harris Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #94
When did Harris last talk about busing, not in response to a question? StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #97
I hope so Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #98
"Media attention" - 'nuff said StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #101
She still could have accepted Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #102
She did accept his apology - in fact she said she applauded it StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #103
I'm not moving the goal posts Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #107
Harris is the one "Not letting this GO". Cha Jul 2019 #100
How is she not letting this go? StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #104
If she thinks she can ride her debate performance and Biden was a segregationist like his pals emmaverybo Jul 2019 #105
So who is "not letting this GO"? Cha Jul 2019 #99
I just peeked. Nt BootinUp Jul 2019 #112
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Kamala Harris stops short...»Reply #16