Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)I hope Harris will explain her appointment to, and work for, the CA Medical Assistance Commission [View all]
Harris has made it clear that she believes the primaries should include vettng of what candidates said and did decades ago.
So I hope that she and/or her campaign will offer voters some detailed information on her appointment in 1994 to a California state commission that paid $99,000 a year (plus benefits, according to a San Francisco Chronicle article) for going to two meetings taking a few hours per month.
This is the California law creating that commission:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=WIC&division=9.&title=&part=3.&chapter=7.&article=5.1.
This is the paragraph explaining the requirements for being on the commission:
The commission shall be composed of seven voting members and two ex officio members. The voting members shall be selected from persons with experience in management of hospital services, risk management insurance or prepaid health programs, the delivery of health services, the management of county health systems, and a representative of recipients of service. The Directors of the Department of Health Services and the Department of Finance, or their designees, shall serve as ex officio nonvoting members of the commission.
Emphasis added.
Harris had absolutely none of those qualifications. She was an assistant or deputy DA for Alameda County when she was appointed, and she continued working as a full-time prosecutor while also serving on the medical commission for years, earning hundreds of thousands of dollars of additional income from the commission.
I would really like to know, in some detail, just how much work Harris did for the commission.
I'm particularly interested after reading, in a San Francisco Chronicle artlcle from 2002, that Harris "registered the highest absentee rate during her last two years on the panel, missing nearly 20 percent of the meetings."
https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Lawmakers-put-cronies-in-plum-jobs-Big-pay-few-2864693.php
That article explains that a number of people who apparently didn't have proper qualifications were appointed to this commission and others.
But those other people aren't running for president, let alone stressing that it's important to look at a candidate's record going back decades.
So I'd like a detailed explanation from Harris of why she accepted an appointment to a commission for which she had none of the qualifications stipulated by the law creating that commission.
I'd like to know what work she did for the commission during those years. It would be particularly helpful to have statements about this from third parties who did have the sort of experience stipulated by that California law -- expert testimony always helps.
I'd like to know why she had the highest absentee rate, when she only had to show up for two meetings a month.
Please note I'm citing the SF Chronicle, a very reputable paper, for this background.
And please note, too, that I'm also pointing out, via the article, that there was a pattern of unqualified people being appointed to a few California commissions that paid very high salaries for very few hours of work.
I'm not saying that this wasn't a systemic problem, and an embarrassment for everyone involved in it.
But because Harris is running for president, and because she's insistent that candidates' backgrounds from decades ago must be considered, I would like to see her, or her campaign, provide thorough and convincing information about this.
I'd also like to know, since Harris accepted an appointment for which she had none of the qualifications, how carefully she'd consider qualifications of people she'll appoint if elected president...or if she thinks that under certain circumstances the customary or even legally-required qualifications can be ignored.
Having these questions answered would go a long way toward removing some doubts I've had about Harris (who had previously been one of my favorites among the Democratic candidates) after learning more about her background.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
150 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I hope Harris will explain her appointment to, and work for, the CA Medical Assistance Commission [View all]
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
OP
She should have the answers ready anyway. Including now, for Democrats like myself who'd had
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#2
I want to follow up with what I mean about how deflection will be necessary to defend her record.
SouthernProgressive
Jul 2019
#15
She's also fond of saying "Let's move on" (judging by what I've read) but seems to have a double
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#68
So your response to my OP about Harris accepting an appointment for which she had none
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#7
Lucrative appointments to Commissions, Creative use of tax loopholes... it should all be vetted.
bluewater
Jul 2019
#16
OP: "believing the primaries should include vetting of what candidates said and did"
bluewater
Jul 2019
#28
Was this during the time she was dating Willie Brown, Democratic speaker of the California State
jalan48
Jul 2019
#4
According to everything I've been able to discover, it is correct. The SF Chronice article I link
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#13
Assistant DA. She was one of "the People's" representatives in criminal court cases.
lapucelle
Jul 2019
#20
She wasn't, but I always remembered it because she didn't have a hospital background.
LisaM
Jul 2019
#40
I don't particularly care about Harris's past relationships. I do care that she accepted an
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#33
She was a lawyer with experience in community relations through the city of Chicago.
58Sunliner
Jul 2019
#133
Abject denial of reality to support bias is also bemusing. At times. nt, part II
LanternWaste
Jul 2019
#25
This isn't concern trolling. I've stated in this forum previously that Harris was among my favorite
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#26
Again, I'd had a high opinion of Harris, and had said so here, before learning more about her
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#35
I ran across nothing explaining her appointment to the board that way. Harris's own explanation
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#23
So now we are criticizing people for working with Medi-Cal (Medicaid), the best model
Hoyt
Jul 2019
#34
No, I'm questioning someone accepting a high-paying appointment to a commission for which
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#36
Would you accept an appoointment to a highly paid commission doing important work if you had
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#38
I actually worked for another state Medicaid program. The Board was made up of highly
Hoyt
Jul 2019
#47
I don't know what your state's law stipulated as qualifications for members of that program, but
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#67
No, they were NOT qualified...which was the point of that SF Chronicle article.
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#72
There's absolutely no evidence I've been able to find that says she was the person appointed
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#87
Willie Brown is one of the most accomplished politicians in this country. He recognizes
Hoyt
Jul 2019
#138
agree! All of us complain bitterly about repukes having cush jobs they are not really qualified for
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#105
Qualifications required: "... and a representative of recipients of service."
bluewater
Jul 2019
#56
And yet you never mentioned she had an 80% attendance rate in all subsequent posts.
bluewater
Jul 2019
#69
I worked in the medical field all my life. Sat on various boards for air lift medical transport
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#107
Oh, and please note that, as the article explains, the average salary of a Penn professor is $270K.
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#79
Politicub, since the qualifications stipulated in the law creating the commission referred to
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#81
She wasn't some random person off the street. You do realize that, highplainsdem, don't you?
Politicub
Jul 2019
#83
It is hard to think she thought it was important when she didn't show up for board meetings
dsc
Jul 2019
#86
She was there 80% of the time AND had a full-time job in the DA's office AND was highly qualified.
Politicub
Jul 2019
#89
Some posts insinuate she didn't belong there or wasn't good enough. That's offensive to me.
Politicub
Jul 2019
#94
Well you should probably understand the context in which not one, but 2 jobs were
58Sunliner
Jul 2019
#137
I'm a Warren person, and I have no idea what the issue is. I do have a sense for the motivation...
Politicub
Jul 2019
#84
I agree. My grandmother served on the board of a non-profit and had a full-time job. She wasn't able
Politicub
Jul 2019
#90
Had she been offered $90k, she would have taken it. Do you think that Harris set her own salary?
Politicub
Jul 2019
#95
Again, you're talking about a different type of board. This health-care comimission was established
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#96
First off, she was working for people of California. Second, you don't mention her record
Hoyt
Jul 2019
#106
No. These offer an opportunity for nepotism and eating at the public trough.
emmaverybo
Jul 2019
#108
Your talking point has been debunked. This has been covered over and over again
Politicub
Jul 2019
#125
Stretch it all you want. Obviously this was the technicality used to bring people in to enjoy the
emmaverybo
Jul 2019
#128
It wasn't the only job Willie gave her either, for which she was unqualified.
58Sunliner
Jul 2019
#130
Whoa - back up. This is complete hyperbole with no basis in fact. Promising to tell details about
Politicub
Jul 2019
#139
Sorry-true, not a right wing talking point. She did indeed mention it at a campaign event.
58Sunliner
Jul 2019
#143
Your are conflating disparate things. There's no way I can debate you when you do that.
Politicub
Jul 2019
#144