Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Why I can't support Mayor Pete [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,524 posts)3. I have no problem with it. I also agree that religion and government shouldn't mix,
but the reality is that many if not most politicians (Obama, for example) do ascribe to some religious faith and that it will influence their personal values. Buttigieg's position is that the right wing doesn't own religion and that they are hypocrites when they talk about it.
I dont think religion belongs to one political party, the mayor of South Bend, Ind., said when asked how his Episcopalian faith informs his values.
When I go to church, the scripture I heard has to do with protecting the poor, and spending time with the prisoner, healing the sick, and caring for the stranger, which, to me, is another word for immigrant," he continued. "It has a very clear set of moral and policy implications, none of which are things I would associate with the right wing.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/446682-buttigieg-weighs-in-on-religion-in-politics-reveals-his-pop-culture-hot
When I go to church, the scripture I heard has to do with protecting the poor, and spending time with the prisoner, healing the sick, and caring for the stranger, which, to me, is another word for immigrant," he continued. "It has a very clear set of moral and policy implications, none of which are things I would associate with the right wing.
The hypocrisy of the evangelical conservatives is really the main reason he talks about religion.
As Buttigieg himself pointed out, Our party doesnt talk about [religion] as much. The reason for this, he said, is that Democrats are committed to the separation of Church and state, and that the party wants to stand for all people, regardless of their religion. But it may also be a reflection of the growing irreligiosity of the Democratic base: The partys most politically engaged voters tend not to be affiliated with any particular faith. Buttigiegs knack for speaking in the language of God makes him exceptional within his generation, but it may also be a strength in reaching the swing voters and voters of color whom Democrats so badly need. Of all the candidates onstage, he spoke most directly to the anger that many Americans seem to feel at the way religion has been co-opted by the Trump administration, at odds with the faith they deeply hold.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/06/pete-buttigieg-religion/592897/
Religion in politics is a problem when the power of the state is used to enforce the beliefs of a particular religious group, which is what the evangelicals are trying to do. The fact that a candidate for office speaks of his religion to point out the hypocrisy of those who would use their religion to do harm doesn't bother me at all.
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I take issue with that as well but will vote for him if he's the nominee (and doesn't
chowder66
Jul 2019
#1
Yes. If he is the nominee and regarding tripping up, depending... it could be enough.
chowder66
Jul 2019
#25
Can you name any Democratic president or nominee who wasn't quite open about belonging to a
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#2
You're right about Bernie. But I was asking about past presidents and presidential nominees, not
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#85
Whether or not he gets the nomination, I think it's extremely important, and helpful to
highplainsdem
Jul 2019
#87
I have no problem with it. I also agree that religion and government shouldn't mix,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jul 2019
#3
Zero of his policies have anything religious in content, I am an atheist to the bone, and have
Celerity
Jul 2019
#42
I have watched dozens upon dozens of hours of talks and speeches, have read a copious amount
Celerity
Jul 2019
#46
Then you have no reason to doubt Buttigieg, unless you can demonstrate that
marylandblue
Jul 2019
#59
Actually, though i'm agnostic, I LOVE that he is doing that. Taking the RW fundy hypocrisy headon
hlthe2b
Jul 2019
#6
I do that myself... Mayor Pete is possibly the smartest person running for President
lapfog_1
Jul 2019
#68
turn him loose in a debate with Pence, lolo.Also, the Never-Trumper Rethugs talk about being ashamed
Celerity
Jul 2019
#43
I agree. Let's elect candidates for whom FACTS - not fantasy - are of primary concern.
stopbush
Jul 2019
#10
Huh? I think Buttigieg would agree with you about separation of religion and government. There's
KPN
Jul 2019
#13
"Why do you assume that people's motives are other than what they say they are?"
left-of-center2012
Jul 2019
#29
For me, "reclaiming" the bible should not be a policy the president takes the lead on.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jul 2019
#18
Buttigieg has to run for president unlike any other person who has come before him.
Politicub
Jul 2019
#64