Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

SouthernProgressive

(1,810 posts)
9. +1
Fri Jul 19, 2019, 01:07 PM
Jul 2019

Seems you agree that Sanders isn't being straight with the American people.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Every study, including the ones cited in the OP, estimate that M4A would save money. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #1
This is too funny. SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #3
Show me a study that shows M4A would be more expensive than our current healthcare system. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #6
There is no study in the op or article that shows he is wrong. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #7
The OP/article is dubious. Nice try. KPN Jul 2019 #10
AP Fake News! nt SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #12
No, just a lack of any definitive substantiation. KPN Jul 2019 #32
Yep. ehrnst Jul 2019 #46
No they do not. Come on. How COULD they when its details haven't Hortensis Jul 2019 #21
You would have to ask the people who conducted the studies. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #22
Where's an estimate from the General Accounting Office Hortensis Jul 2019 #23
KR for Reality Check! Cha Jul 2019 #2
...this article is dubious. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #4
Not too far right for Sanders. SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #8
He cites that study specifically BECAUSE it's from a right wing source. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #11
The author that Sanders likes to go to says they are mischaracterizing the study. SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #14
Their study is clear. Commissioned by right wingers but run independantly. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #15
So it's an independent study? Not a right wing study? NT SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #16
I never said it was a right wing study. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #17
"Commissioned by right wingers but run independantly" Lordquinton Jul 2019 #43
So right wingers were honest enough to publish it, but not honest enough to explain it? marylandblue Jul 2019 #36
Bingo. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2019 #49
Interesting how many who support the Mercatus claim try to rip apart the Urban Institute as bogus ehrnst Jul 2019 #48
spending would be $3.9 trillion under Medicare for all, versus $3.8 trillion now bluewater Jul 2019 #5
+1 SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #9
Seems I agree that medicare for all makes a lot of sense. bluewater Jul 2019 #13
"people will actually have health care they can afford to use" Lordquinton Jul 2019 #44
It sounds like you are the one cherry picking. ehrnst Jul 2019 #47
Until someone provides creditable cost estimates of what 43, 44, etc., year old man/woman will pay - Hoyt Jul 2019 #18
I think they have the common sense to know that single payer Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #19
If we got rid of insurance companies today, at best our "premium" cost would drop 6 - 10%. Hoyt Jul 2019 #24
It is true some will spend more and some will spend less. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #25
Drug costs are about 8% of our health care costs. Cut it in half, and you still aren't going to Hoyt Jul 2019 #27
I just think it is doing far more than other plans can Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #29
I think we are close to doing something worthwhile, and Sanders deserves credit for encouraging it. Hoyt Jul 2019 #33
Agreed. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #35
That's not true. Germany and Switzerland do not have single payer. marylandblue Jul 2019 #37
I stand corrected. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #39
Yes, we are the only one without universal coverage, but marylandblue Jul 2019 #40
And it is appreciated Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #41
The ACA is what you describe. And that was not enough for Sanders. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2019 #50
"Pay a little more" ehrnst Jul 2019 #51
Just slogans no real plans nt NYMinute Jul 2019 #20
Good way to put it. Hoyt Jul 2019 #28
Actually the plan is quite extensive Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #31
Considering Biden's plan is basically Obama's original legislation, it's a well established plan. marylandblue Jul 2019 #38
I have a plan to go to the moon on my bicycle NYMinute Jul 2019 #42
Bernie math. Not the first time either still_one Jul 2019 #26
M4A, really?--"Whatever may be our wishes or inclinations, or dictates oasis Jul 2019 #30
How are people going to be for or against Medicare for All Everyman Jackal Jul 2019 #34
K&R Tarheel_Dem Jul 2019 #45
Societal Savings are not tax revenues and this plan will not work in the real world Gothmog Jul 2019 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»AP FACT CHECK: Savings fr...»Reply #9