Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
36. So right wingers were honest enough to publish it, but not honest enough to explain it?
Fri Jul 19, 2019, 04:07 PM
Jul 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Every study, including the ones cited in the OP, estimate that M4A would save money. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #1
This is too funny. SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #3
Show me a study that shows M4A would be more expensive than our current healthcare system. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #6
There is no study in the op or article that shows he is wrong. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #7
The OP/article is dubious. Nice try. KPN Jul 2019 #10
AP Fake News! nt SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #12
No, just a lack of any definitive substantiation. KPN Jul 2019 #32
Yep. ehrnst Jul 2019 #46
No they do not. Come on. How COULD they when its details haven't Hortensis Jul 2019 #21
You would have to ask the people who conducted the studies. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #22
Where's an estimate from the General Accounting Office Hortensis Jul 2019 #23
KR for Reality Check! Cha Jul 2019 #2
...this article is dubious. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #4
Not too far right for Sanders. SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #8
He cites that study specifically BECAUSE it's from a right wing source. HerbChestnut Jul 2019 #11
The author that Sanders likes to go to says they are mischaracterizing the study. SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #14
Their study is clear. Commissioned by right wingers but run independantly. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #15
So it's an independent study? Not a right wing study? NT SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #16
I never said it was a right wing study. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #17
"Commissioned by right wingers but run independantly" Lordquinton Jul 2019 #43
So right wingers were honest enough to publish it, but not honest enough to explain it? marylandblue Jul 2019 #36
Bingo. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2019 #49
Interesting how many who support the Mercatus claim try to rip apart the Urban Institute as bogus ehrnst Jul 2019 #48
spending would be $3.9 trillion under Medicare for all, versus $3.8 trillion now bluewater Jul 2019 #5
+1 SouthernProgressive Jul 2019 #9
Seems I agree that medicare for all makes a lot of sense. bluewater Jul 2019 #13
"people will actually have health care they can afford to use" Lordquinton Jul 2019 #44
It sounds like you are the one cherry picking. ehrnst Jul 2019 #47
Until someone provides creditable cost estimates of what 43, 44, etc., year old man/woman will pay - Hoyt Jul 2019 #18
I think they have the common sense to know that single payer Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #19
If we got rid of insurance companies today, at best our "premium" cost would drop 6 - 10%. Hoyt Jul 2019 #24
It is true some will spend more and some will spend less. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #25
Drug costs are about 8% of our health care costs. Cut it in half, and you still aren't going to Hoyt Jul 2019 #27
I just think it is doing far more than other plans can Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #29
I think we are close to doing something worthwhile, and Sanders deserves credit for encouraging it. Hoyt Jul 2019 #33
Agreed. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #35
That's not true. Germany and Switzerland do not have single payer. marylandblue Jul 2019 #37
I stand corrected. Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #39
Yes, we are the only one without universal coverage, but marylandblue Jul 2019 #40
And it is appreciated Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #41
The ACA is what you describe. And that was not enough for Sanders. (nt) ehrnst Jul 2019 #50
"Pay a little more" ehrnst Jul 2019 #51
Just slogans no real plans nt NYMinute Jul 2019 #20
Good way to put it. Hoyt Jul 2019 #28
Actually the plan is quite extensive Tiggeroshii Jul 2019 #31
Considering Biden's plan is basically Obama's original legislation, it's a well established plan. marylandblue Jul 2019 #38
I have a plan to go to the moon on my bicycle NYMinute Jul 2019 #42
Bernie math. Not the first time either still_one Jul 2019 #26
M4A, really?--"Whatever may be our wishes or inclinations, or dictates oasis Jul 2019 #30
How are people going to be for or against Medicare for All Everyman Jackal Jul 2019 #34
K&R Tarheel_Dem Jul 2019 #45
Societal Savings are not tax revenues and this plan will not work in the real world Gothmog Jul 2019 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»AP FACT CHECK: Savings fr...»Reply #36