Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Gillibrand is so full of it. [View all]zentrum
(9,870 posts)18. As furious with her now as
....I was when she first did it.
Felt then that she'd done it in a calculated---she saw it as bringing her a big MeToo following on her march to the Presidency. Pure ambition. It blew up in her face then and even more now.
Al was in the mold of Paul Wellstone. Miss him terribly.
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
296 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She makes me weary. I'm hoping that after next week's debate she faces reality and drops out.
George II
Jul 2019
#1
It shows the FACT that people witnessed her leading the charge...you just don't like that FACT
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#232
Nope. I want you to practice what you preach and stop trying to have it both ways
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#182
You are right, Baltimike, and it's not just gaslighting, but it's spinning like a top
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#262
IMO she's starting to remind me of the crack about Guiliani. "A noun, a verb and 9/11.
brush
Jul 2019
#102
Yes it is...because no FACT will convince you...you just keep gaslighting. nt
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#245
lol...the links in the post. I didn't want to take credit for someone els'e work. nt
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#152
Again...gaslighting. Nothing will suffice for you, so you keep gaslighting. nt
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#265
So we both would never ever want to take credit for an Oberliner post. But for different reasons ...
marble falls
Jul 2019
#285
I stand by my comment. I'd never take credit for anything he had to say for any reason.
marble falls
Jul 2019
#288
Gillibrand led the charge against Franken, she owns it and still doesn't TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IT !!!
trueblue2007
Jul 2019
#92
Except, in actuality, no Dems voted for Bush's war ... nor did any Repubs ...
mr_lebowski
Jul 2019
#103
Franken needed handlers to discuss and direct his behavior with others. But it is everyone else's
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#12
The whole article supports Franken. Yes. It does. And it still tells us that Franken
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#69
Oh, yes they are. They dismiss Frankens behavior consistently and constantly.
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#25
No. Thanks to Franken for not having the courage to stand up and address this. Geez,
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#28
He did. But Schumer forced his resignation (according to the new New Yorker article)
Cetacea
Jul 2019
#33
Did not force. Franken acquiesced. Democrats told him to step down, and he did. EIGHT women
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#36
Ok. It was hard. 8 accusations. It was not unreasonable for the Democratic senate to say enough
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#213
First. There was a photo of him acting like a stupid teen boy impressing friends
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#221
So after accusations hit a certain number, they no longer deserve to be investigated?
BlueStater
Jul 2019
#58
They stated step down after 8 accusations. Franken could have easily said, he didn't do anything
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#60
No. He grabbed a part of her body and held on. That would be his physical obtusenss
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#215
Franken himself knew he stepped over the line on this stuff. His people knew. Friends knew.
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#218
"Franken did not step over any line with that photo op" He didn't? I disagree.
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#224
I get your point. But sometimes it is better to not post at all if the emotions
Blue_true
Jul 2019
#198
What's right about calling for someone to step down based on allegations alone?
BlueStater
Jul 2019
#59
Primarily because a lot of people still question whether Franken was actually guilty of anything.
BlueStater
Jul 2019
#85
I see your point, it would have been tough for him, but he could have chosen to fight on.
Blue_true
Jul 2019
#199
An example of what a politician says when their plan to take credit for an action does awry.
dem4decades
Jul 2019
#32
Her Doubling Down on Her Position Without Any Reflection is Why She'll Never Get Above 1-2%.
Indykatie
Jul 2019
#50
We're still angry with her because she collaborated with Roger Stone's ratfecking of Franken
cp
Jul 2019
#81
That's not true. There were plenty of rumours about him running for President, especially around the
OnDoutside
Jul 2019
#167
Were any of those folks anti-immigration like Gillibrand was when she pandered
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#110
The only other non-sequitor besides your other one is your initial question to me in post 128
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#147
So you're saying we need a President who can rally every Senator to her side?
brooklynite
Jul 2019
#120
Warren, Booker, Sanders and Harris?? How about citing some specifics in regards to
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#139
Who was the FIRST one of those four folks and Gillibrand to call for Franken's resignation?
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#148
Correct. Gillibrand was the first one to get the ball rolling on ousting Franken.
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#159
Yes. Any Senator that called for Sen. Franken to resigns lacks judgement to be President. nt
kelly1mm
Jul 2019
#191
SO you'll vote in the GE for someone without the judgement to be President?
brooklynite
Jul 2019
#196