Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Gillibrand is so full of it. [View all]lame54
(39,771 posts)37. The thread is about Gillibrand not owning her actions
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
296 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She makes me weary. I'm hoping that after next week's debate she faces reality and drops out.
George II
Jul 2019
#1
It shows the FACT that people witnessed her leading the charge...you just don't like that FACT
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#232
Nope. I want you to practice what you preach and stop trying to have it both ways
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#182
You are right, Baltimike, and it's not just gaslighting, but it's spinning like a top
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#262
IMO she's starting to remind me of the crack about Guiliani. "A noun, a verb and 9/11.
brush
Jul 2019
#102
Yes it is...because no FACT will convince you...you just keep gaslighting. nt
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#245
lol...the links in the post. I didn't want to take credit for someone els'e work. nt
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#152
Again...gaslighting. Nothing will suffice for you, so you keep gaslighting. nt
Baltimike
Jul 2019
#265
So we both would never ever want to take credit for an Oberliner post. But for different reasons ...
marble falls
Jul 2019
#285
I stand by my comment. I'd never take credit for anything he had to say for any reason.
marble falls
Jul 2019
#288
Gillibrand led the charge against Franken, she owns it and still doesn't TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IT !!!
trueblue2007
Jul 2019
#92
Except, in actuality, no Dems voted for Bush's war ... nor did any Repubs ...
mr_lebowski
Jul 2019
#103
Franken needed handlers to discuss and direct his behavior with others. But it is everyone else's
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#12
The whole article supports Franken. Yes. It does. And it still tells us that Franken
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#69
Oh, yes they are. They dismiss Frankens behavior consistently and constantly.
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#25
No. Thanks to Franken for not having the courage to stand up and address this. Geez,
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#28
He did. But Schumer forced his resignation (according to the new New Yorker article)
Cetacea
Jul 2019
#33
Did not force. Franken acquiesced. Democrats told him to step down, and he did. EIGHT women
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#36
Ok. It was hard. 8 accusations. It was not unreasonable for the Democratic senate to say enough
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#213
First. There was a photo of him acting like a stupid teen boy impressing friends
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#221
So after accusations hit a certain number, they no longer deserve to be investigated?
BlueStater
Jul 2019
#58
They stated step down after 8 accusations. Franken could have easily said, he didn't do anything
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#60
No. He grabbed a part of her body and held on. That would be his physical obtusenss
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#215
Franken himself knew he stepped over the line on this stuff. His people knew. Friends knew.
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#218
"Franken did not step over any line with that photo op" He didn't? I disagree.
silentEcho
Jul 2019
#224
I get your point. But sometimes it is better to not post at all if the emotions
Blue_true
Jul 2019
#198
What's right about calling for someone to step down based on allegations alone?
BlueStater
Jul 2019
#59
Primarily because a lot of people still question whether Franken was actually guilty of anything.
BlueStater
Jul 2019
#85
I see your point, it would have been tough for him, but he could have chosen to fight on.
Blue_true
Jul 2019
#199
An example of what a politician says when their plan to take credit for an action does awry.
dem4decades
Jul 2019
#32
Her Doubling Down on Her Position Without Any Reflection is Why She'll Never Get Above 1-2%.
Indykatie
Jul 2019
#50
We're still angry with her because she collaborated with Roger Stone's ratfecking of Franken
cp
Jul 2019
#81
That's not true. There were plenty of rumours about him running for President, especially around the
OnDoutside
Jul 2019
#167
Were any of those folks anti-immigration like Gillibrand was when she pandered
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#110
The only other non-sequitor besides your other one is your initial question to me in post 128
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#147
So you're saying we need a President who can rally every Senator to her side?
brooklynite
Jul 2019
#120
Warren, Booker, Sanders and Harris?? How about citing some specifics in regards to
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#139
Who was the FIRST one of those four folks and Gillibrand to call for Franken's resignation?
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#148
Correct. Gillibrand was the first one to get the ball rolling on ousting Franken.
mtnsnake
Jul 2019
#159
Yes. Any Senator that called for Sen. Franken to resigns lacks judgement to be President. nt
kelly1mm
Jul 2019
#191
SO you'll vote in the GE for someone without the judgement to be President?
brooklynite
Jul 2019
#196