Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: WAPO: Why go to the trouble of running for president to promote ideas that can't work? [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)31. ... and for the sake of "bragging rights" or demonstrations of "purity" is not very smart either.
I'm always amazed whenever I see a politician who takes an "all or nothing" approach to negotiating. In their mind, there's NO compromise and NO middle ground. --- So instead of making people's lives better with HALF a loaf, the politician boasts about "sanding by his guns" (or hers) ... and is somehow PROUD and GIDDY to tell his (or her) constituents that ZERO PROGRESS was made.
If zero progress is being made, how is that "progressive"?
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WAPO: Why go to the trouble of running for president to promote ideas that can't work? [View all]
wyldwolf
Aug 2019
OP
yeah, when it comes to trying to score points at Obama's expense, you should give up
wyldwolf
Aug 2019
#4
She did not frame it as an attack on Obama. And Obama, himself, sees single payer as
blm
Aug 2019
#81
... and for the sake of "bragging rights" or demonstrations of "purity" is not very smart either.
NurseJackie
Aug 2019
#31
I prefer 'mendacity' and facts over the impossible dream as detailed by some candidates who will
Demsrule86
Aug 2019
#50
the lines have become increasingly blurred in the age of 24 hour news and the internet
wyldwolf
Aug 2019
#7
No, not really. Idealogical grandiosity was the tool to get the public behind the military push
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#32
True - I like this better: "Joe Biden for President....because getting rid of Trump is paramount."
Skya Rhen
Aug 2019
#44
There is a difference between having aspirations and trying to find the best way to implement...what
Demsrule86
Aug 2019
#51
I, too, agree with you SLClarke and Farmer-Rick. It's the dreams we've had that have created our
in2herbs
Aug 2019
#27
Delivery of care could be disrupted if a massive change in the system is implemented too quickly.
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#38
"sustainable policy in America would emerge only by means of principled compromise
crazytown
Aug 2019
#13
+1000. There have to be details, not just "I'm not going to speculate on that right now"
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#45
I know people liked her line, but I immediately felt it was counter productive.
themaguffin
Aug 2019
#39
Realistically, for MFA, you'd need to win the WH, the House and the Senate by well in excess of 60,
OnDoutside
Aug 2019
#49
Grounded in mathematical & political reality usually means, "How are we going to pay for it?"
CrispyQ
Aug 2019
#54
"Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, Or what's a heaven for?" ― Robert Browning
Princetonian
Aug 2019
#72
I tend to bookmark posts on DU that I think are prolific. Your reply reminded me of one
wyldwolf
Aug 2019
#86
Fighting over the details of their healthcare proposals won't help them beat Donald Trump
Gothmog
Aug 2019
#93
Warren almost pissed me off with that one. The ultimate irony is she who proposes in great...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2019
#106