Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Why Bernie Sanders Is Absolutely Correct About the Washington Post--and Corporate Media Overall [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)25. Marty Baron isn't a 'circus dog' and I'm thinking that the author of this article might be
a bit embarassed to read this in WaPo.
If Baron and his staff are a 'circus dog' that dog certainly didn't heel to Amazon on this article, did they?
A prominent Washington-area economist wrote an opinion piece welcoming the arrival of Amazons new headquarters in Northern Virginia at the suggestion of a company official who hoped to build public support for the project before a key Arlington County Board vote, emails show.
Stephen S. Fuller, a professor at George Mason University, also showed the article to Amazon public relations staff before publication and invited them to suggest changes although he rejected their revisions.
I want to [be] helpful to your Amazons mission and objectives with respect to its move to Arlington, Fuller wrote on March 1 to Jill Shatzen Kerr, Amazons policy communications manager, according to emails obtained by The Washington Post under a Freedom of Information Act request.
Fuller first offered the opinion piece to The Washington Post, which turned it down. The Washington Business Journal published it March 21 under the headline, Dont underestimate Amazon HQ2s importance.
Fullers interactions with Amazon, which were not disclosed to the Washington Business Journal or its readers, raised questions about whether he was acting independently and transparently in penning the article, according to some ethics experts. The journals editor said the publication would have handled the article differently had it known.
(Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.)
Stephen S. Fuller, a professor at George Mason University, also showed the article to Amazon public relations staff before publication and invited them to suggest changes although he rejected their revisions.
I want to [be] helpful to your Amazons mission and objectives with respect to its move to Arlington, Fuller wrote on March 1 to Jill Shatzen Kerr, Amazons policy communications manager, according to emails obtained by The Washington Post under a Freedom of Information Act request.
Fuller first offered the opinion piece to The Washington Post, which turned it down. The Washington Business Journal published it March 21 under the headline, Dont underestimate Amazon HQ2s importance.
Fullers interactions with Amazon, which were not disclosed to the Washington Business Journal or its readers, raised questions about whether he was acting independently and transparently in penning the article, according to some ethics experts. The journals editor said the publication would have handled the article differently had it known.
(Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/prominent-economist-wrote-op-ed-about-amazons-new-headquarters-at-companys-suggestion/2019/08/09/42b206b8-b885-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Bernie Sanders Is Absolutely Correct About the Washington Post--and Corporate Media Overall [View all]
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
OP
Trying to discredit WaPo didn't work for Nixon, and it won't work for Trump or Bernie.
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#28
They run a whole lot more 'negative stories' on Trump. Does that also 'discredit' WaPo?
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#40
It seems that Bernie feels a need to do a lot of 'clarifying" of his statements after the fact.
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#35
By "corporate media" you mean any media that holds Sentor Sanders to account for his words?
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#73
Going after Marty Baron's credibility because WaPo isn't fawning over you is really desperation.(nt)
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#27
IOW, they ran out of stock because someone failed to keep their eyes on the ball.
TexasTowelie
Aug 2019
#51
Marty Baron isn't a 'circus dog' and I'm thinking that the author of this article might be
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#25
I never thought I'd see liberals trash the free press when they fact checked a politician
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#45
"The washington Post is not a respectable journalistic entity." If not, then...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2019
#63
They are not news orgs, any more than FoxNews. They have a clear political bias/slant
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#69
Yeah, Pulitzer Prizes are given to bad journalists and news orgs ALL the time...
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#68
I've reported on Bernie Sanders for years. A free press won't give him what he wants.
Gothmog
Aug 2019
#38
I hope BS will soon accept the consequences of his actions instead of blaming the media
LanternWaste
Aug 2019
#42