Democratic Primaries

lapucelle

(21,066 posts)

70. You are free to post anything you like.

Reply to Princetonian (Reply #68)

Sat Aug 17, 2019, 08:46 PM

Aug 2019

In the meantime...

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Falls off ranking/Tulsi Gabbard" [View all] bigtree Aug 2019 OP

. PunkinPi Aug 2019 #1

Great! Tulsi could get Trump elected EndGOPPropaganda Aug 2019 #2

we couldn't find enough voters to () approve her for pollsters bigtree Aug 2019 #3

I guess not enough alt-right pricks could boost her numbers. Crowman2009 Aug 2019 #19

Doubt it...she was way off base for the Democratic party...whatch...she will end up on the Right ashredux Aug 2019 #7

She could run as an indep. Would be terrible. EndGOPPropaganda Aug 2019 #73

i think the goal is to get Trump elected again JI7 Aug 2019 #10

I cant say that, glad you did Eliot Rosewater Aug 2019 #77

Removing a Sanders surrogate from the ranking... SouthernProgressive Aug 2019 #4

What? That seems like a real twist of logic. Chemisse Aug 2019 #6

"why must Sanders always play a victim card?" SouthernProgressive Aug 2019 #9

It's hard to respect someone like that. Chemisse Aug 2019 #12

BErnie? He says worthwhile stuff all the time, it is the same stuff all the time and Eliot Rosewater Aug 2019 #78

Answering your three questions... thesquanderer Aug 2019 #46

Ohhh, I thought this was related to qualifying to debate #3. Chemisse Aug 2019 #50

+1 K&R onetexan Aug 2019 #59

I think you misinterpreted the post you were replying to thesquanderer Aug 2019 #95

What other candidate whines about things as much wasupaloopa Aug 2019 #22

She had no business running...looked like she was auditioning for FOX ashredux Aug 2019 #5

I worry she is auditioning for a third party run EndGOPPropaganda Aug 2019 #75

Not sure a third party necessarily helps Trump kurtcagle Aug 2019 #80

It does, because Trumpism is a cult EndGOPPropaganda Aug 2019 #84

interesting that Moulton, Bennet, Bullock, and others are still there IronLionZion Aug 2019 #8

+1 MontanaMama Aug 2019 #35

trollberliner will be along soon JI7 Aug 2019 #11

we're disconnected bigtree Aug 2019 #13

At least we see by your example that personally attacking other R B Garr Aug 2019 #14

Gabbard's anti gay diatribes wouldn't fly here at DU bigtree Aug 2019 #15

Speaking of booted off DU..... R B Garr Aug 2019 #17

so you're calling me out on this thread for my recent suspension bigtree Aug 2019 #21

Post removed Post removed Aug 2019 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Aug 2019 #25

It's certainly not incomprehensible to understand that DU R B Garr Aug 2019 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Aug 2019 #27

Post removed Post removed Aug 2019 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Aug 2019 #30

Post removed Post removed Aug 2019 #32

PREACH IT, BIGTREE Skittles Aug 2019 #56

Not to mention that she was doing interviews on Breitbart. Crowman2009 Aug 2019 #20

Gabbard did a great interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper after the second debate. Princetonian Aug 2019 #31

If you found that Gabbard was correct on every point, Hortensis Aug 2019 #34

Well, not every point: Tulsi underestimated the number of MJ/hashish arrests. Princetonian Aug 2019 #38

"The facts: This is a highly misleading statistic." lapucelle Aug 2019 #45

Sigh. I already debunked your cherrypicked sentence. Princetonian Aug 2019 #49

No you didn't. Not only are they direct quotes from your sources, lapucelle Aug 2019 #53

This is about "tell a lie often enough..." Hortensis Aug 2019 #54

Is it even possible to "debunk" directly quoted summary statements? lapucelle Aug 2019 #55

Yes, I can debunk false statements that do not reflect the facts of what Gabbard said in her claim. Princetonian Aug 2019 #62

How can verbatim quotes from your sources be false statements lapucelle Aug 2019 #63

You quoted a cherrypicked sentence without context. Show us the rest of the debate fact check. Princetonian Aug 2019 #65

I quoted the summary conclusion sentence concerning the marijuana claim. N/T lapucelle Aug 2019 #67

Now show context. Quote the rest of the reporter's fact check. You have nothing to hide, right? Princetonian Aug 2019 #69

If you want to post the whole thing, feel free to do so. lapucelle Aug 2019 #71

Show everyone. Quote the entire fact check. Princetonian Aug 2019 #79

The facts: This is a highly misleading statistic. lapucelle Aug 2019 #81

That didn't refer to what Gabbard actually said. Afraid to show the entire fact check? Princetonian Aug 2019 #82

The facts: It's false to say Harris kept prisoners incarcerated beyond their sentences. lapucelle Aug 2019 #83

Harris' office argued against early release citing need for labor. Princetonian Aug 2019 #85

The facts: It's false to say Harris kept prisoners incarcerated beyond their sentences. lapucelle Aug 2019 #87

Your record is skipping. Princetonian Aug 2019 #88

Lord give me strength! Please read the facts before you wrongly malign people. Princetonian Aug 2019 #60

"It's wrong to say Harris put those people in jail" lapucelle Aug 2019 #86

As AG, the buck stopped with Harris. The fact check confirms DA Harris prosecuted MJ cases. Princetonian Aug 2019 #89

Tulsi: She put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations... lapucelle Aug 2019 #90

Gabbard underestimated the number of MJ arrests. As DA, Harris did prosecute MJ violations. Princetonian Aug 2019 #91

Facts: This is a highly misleading statistic. lapucelle Aug 2019 #92

The updated number of 1974 backs up Gabbard's claim. Princetonian Aug 2019 #58

The facts: This is a highly misleading statistic lapucelle Aug 2019 #61

Show us the rest of the reporter's fact check. Princetonian Aug 2019 #64

What does that even mean? lapucelle Aug 2019 #66

Quote the entirety of the reporter's fact check summary not just one cherrypicked sentence. Princetonian Aug 2019 #68

You are free to post anything you like. lapucelle Aug 2019 #70

Why are you refusing to quote the entire fact check? Princetonian Aug 2019 #72

I don't take directives, especially not from strangers lapucelle Aug 2019 #74

Do stop bothering me w/the same cherrypicked sentence again & again. Gabbard's claims are correct. Princetonian Aug 2019 #76

Where is the rest of the quote? Oh, here it is! Princetonian Aug 2019 #57

From the Mercury News Fact checkers: lapucelle Aug 2019 #94

That is false!! FACT: Tulsi has a 100% rating w/HRC & NARAL, is pro-choice & pro-same sex marriage. Princetonian Aug 2019 #29

Her anti-LGBT stuff was long ago, apologized for, she's got top rankings now. thesquanderer Aug 2019 #47

Bye Felicia The Liberal Lion Aug 2019 #16

exactly what i was going to say nini Aug 2019 #36

I'm not sure why she even entered the race as she didn't help herself nor other candidates. Skya Rhen Aug 2019 #18

Yes, and who even knows if Harris will be her only target, R B Garr Aug 2019 #24

Tulsi gave her reasons in an interview on The View. Princetonian Aug 2019 #33

She is targeting SC SCantiGOP Aug 2019 #37

It's not a poll, it's a columnist's weekly power ranking, i.e. entertainment ucrdem Aug 2019 #39

noted bigtree Aug 2019 #40

I agree, post is more unflattering to Harris campaign than Gabbard's. (n/t) thesquanderer Aug 2019 #48

Maybe she should withdraw and run for senator? TexasTowelie Aug 2019 #41

now there's an ugly prospect nt msongs Aug 2019 #43

Lo siento. TexasTowelie Aug 2019 #44

DU rec...nt SidDithers Aug 2019 #42

A bunch of Tulsi people were at the Bettie Aug 2019 #51

No love lost here vapor2 Aug 2019 #52

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on why she is running for President - The View Princetonian Aug 2019 #93