Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Kamala Harris: "Fierce Prosecutor" vs the "Progressive Activist" & Lara Bazelon's Big Fail [View all]
But as I set out to do the real work, I quickly found myself researching Tulsi Gabbard: that culminated in my last piece, Tulsi Gabbard Looks More and More Like a Troll With a Glass Jaw. And dear god, was that a whacky ride down the rabbit hole. She is not a very interesting person, but she certainly does what she can to attract attention where there is not much substance. Gabbard somehow manages to be utterly transparent and dissembling at the same time, making her appear to me, at least, to be a hot disingenuous mess.
In her career, Ms. Harris did not barter or trade to get the support of more conservative law-and-order types; she gave it all away. ~ Lara Bazelon, The New York Times
So recently, as I hear all the truncated criticism of Harris piled on and conflated by opponents, I have been driven to look closer, and oh, what Ive found. I want to start with one person in particular: Lara Bazelon of The New York Times. Her bio says she is a law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles and she authored the January 17, 2019 article, Kamala Harris Was Not a Progressive Prosecutor for the NYT. I pulled up so many pieces on various aspects of the candidates record in California; time and time again, Lara Bazelon is the first reference, the place from which every other liberal journalist described as their baseline line for information. Obviously, I had to check out that article.
To say that I was dumbfounded is putting it politely: Bazelons article is so critically lacking in anything more than cursory research, so lacking in any nuanced, fact based analysis or even necessarily complex narratives, that I could have written this superficial hit piece in the seventh grade. A whole litany of California papers The Los Angeles Times, The Sacramento Bee, SFGate, even Vox, Politico and fucking Wikipedia provided a more thorough, circumspect view of Kamala Harriss prosecutorial past. So while Bazelon was writing to a base already sharing her own narrow liberal lens on criminal justice, it is incomprehensible to me that she is any excuse for an arbiter of candidate Harriss political character. So, Ms. Bazelon, lets try this again.
In her career, Ms. Harris did not barter or trade to get the support of more conservative law-and-order types; she gave it all away. ~ Lara Bazelon, The New York Times
So recently, as I hear all the truncated criticism of Harris piled on and conflated by opponents, I have been driven to look closer, and oh, what Ive found. I want to start with one person in particular: Lara Bazelon of The New York Times. Her bio says she is a law professor and the former director of the Loyola Law School Project for the Innocent in Los Angeles and she authored the January 17, 2019 article, Kamala Harris Was Not a Progressive Prosecutor for the NYT. I pulled up so many pieces on various aspects of the candidates record in California; time and time again, Lara Bazelon is the first reference, the place from which every other liberal journalist described as their baseline line for information. Obviously, I had to check out that article.
To say that I was dumbfounded is putting it politely: Bazelons article is so critically lacking in anything more than cursory research, so lacking in any nuanced, fact based analysis or even necessarily complex narratives, that I could have written this superficial hit piece in the seventh grade. A whole litany of California papers The Los Angeles Times, The Sacramento Bee, SFGate, even Vox, Politico and fucking Wikipedia provided a more thorough, circumspect view of Kamala Harriss prosecutorial past. So while Bazelon was writing to a base already sharing her own narrow liberal lens on criminal justice, it is incomprehensible to me that she is any excuse for an arbiter of candidate Harriss political character. So, Ms. Bazelon, lets try this again.
https://medium.com/gayleleslie/kamala-harris-fierce-prosecutor-vs-the-progressive-activist-lara-bazelons-big-fail-1f679b70663a
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kamala Harris: "Fierce Prosecutor" vs the "Progressive Activist" & Lara Bazelon's Big Fail [View all]
ismnotwasm
Aug 2019
OP
People fall for what Mz. Bazelon wrote hook, line and sinker 'cause it fits their world view.
Kaleva
Aug 2019
#7
Baselon is an honorable person and does not deserve to be trashed by Harris surrogates...it won't
Demsrule86
Aug 2019
#9
It is not slander...there is no question that some of what Sen. Harris did as AG and DA...raises
Demsrule86
Aug 2019
#13
There is truth to be found...and I hope Sen. Harris addresses it. She would be better off.
Demsrule86
Aug 2019
#15