Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

LAS14

(15,507 posts)
Sat Mar 16, 2019, 11:43 AM Mar 2019

Is there an easier way to count the posters in Democratic Primaries than this? [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Yonnie3 (a host of the Democratic Primaries forum).

Last edited Sat Mar 16, 2019, 05:48 PM - Edit history (4)

I figured I could type names of posters into a spreadsheet. As the project went on I would recognize names that I'd already entered and could skip them. At the end I could sort and delete duplicates. Time consuming, yes. I could do it over time. Does anyone have a better approach?

Edit after some replies: I'm NOT interested in gathering names. I'm only interested in the total count of participants in the Democratic Primaries forum. It's a figure MANY people have expressed an interest in knowing, but the replies here suggest the people suspect me of nefarious motives. Why not assume the best instead of the worst????

tia
las

STATUS REPORT 1: I hit 100 unique participants after counting in 4 high participation posts. I'll keep doing this over time until I begin to get mostly duplicates. Not scientific by a long shot, but it should tell us whether we're dealing with 100 or 1000.

STATUS REPORT 2: It took me 20 minutes to find 100 more unique participants. I'm going to do some errands now.

STATUS REPORT 3: I changed tactics and went through the names of the OPs for the seventeen available pages (1 month). The new names dropped off sharply at about page 6. The total is now 406. Next I'll go look at the most active post on each page to get a sample of people who reply but don't generate OPs.

STATUS REPORT 4: My last pass was to look at 2 or 3 active posts on each page. I tried to find threads that dealt with different topics. I stopped at page 10 because I was finding so few new names. Final report is that there are, for sure, 500 unique posters in this forum, and probably not a whole lot more.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't see the need, but Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #1
The ease with which new personas can be created makes a statistical analysis difficult. McCamy Taylor Mar 2019 #2
No. I just want to know how many people are behind the percentages. Why would.. LAS14 Mar 2019 #6
Those numbers at the top mean absolutely nothing. I ignore them. McCamy Taylor Mar 2019 #15
I think they count the members who identify a preference, Hortensis Mar 2019 #32
Not sure what purpose it would serve. Honestly, it sounds like ... NurseJackie Mar 2019 #3
???? Just curiosity. There's lots of wondering about how many people... LAS14 Mar 2019 #4
Look around. NurseJackie Mar 2019 #9
Enemies lists are known to happen around here, especially during heated primaries Awsi Dooger Mar 2019 #20
Thanks. Enlightening. I wasn't a member in 2008, but I'm appalled at what... LAS14 Mar 2019 #21
Thanks for the history, Awsi. Hortensis Mar 2019 #33
Why? Politicub Mar 2019 #5
Many people have wondered how may people are behind the percentages.... LAS14 Mar 2019 #7
Like who? I lurk here all the time, and you are the first I've seen wanting a list of posters' names Politicub Mar 2019 #8
I don't want a list of names except to get a count. LOTs of DUers have expressed... LAS14 Mar 2019 #12
If "LOTs" of DUers have expressed curiosity about the total count ... SFnomad Mar 2019 #18
Politicub said I wanted a list of posters' names. I don't want the names except... LAS14 Mar 2019 #22
In other words ... no, you can't provide it ... thought so ... SFnomad Mar 2019 #24
Wrong. nt LAS14 Mar 2019 #25
LAS14, some members will have chosen to quickly indicate Hortensis Mar 2019 #34
It's a futile exercise. People change their minds dalton99a Mar 2019 #10
Of what use would such a list be? MineralMan Mar 2019 #11
It's creepy to be stalked and monitored like that. NurseJackie Mar 2019 #27
Nobody wants to be doxxed. This is making me uncomfortable. Someone needs... NurseJackie Mar 2019 #28
People have been doing that always. MineralMan Mar 2019 #40
STATUS REPORT LAS14 Mar 2019 #13
Keep it up LAS14! rgbecker Mar 2019 #14
Thanks! nt LAS14 Mar 2019 #16
STATUS REPORT 2 LAS14 Mar 2019 #17
STATUS REPORT 3 LAS14 Mar 2019 #19
STATUS REPORT #4 LAS14 Mar 2019 #23
I am kind of surprised there are that many. Seems like pretty much the same names I see. Tipperary Mar 2019 #30
Are you looking at the total replies as a percentage of all replies? guillaumeb Mar 2019 #26
LAS14, participants includes people who come to read but don't post. Hortensis Mar 2019 #29
It would certainly intimidate lurkers into NOT posting... NurseJackie Mar 2019 #31
:) If quiet members are "intimidatable." Hortensis Mar 2019 #36
I think membership is connected with posting, but I'm not completely sure. nt LAS14 Mar 2019 #35
Many come mainly to check the home page and LBN. Hortensis Mar 2019 #38
Are you sure that people who don't post are counted in the percentages? LAS14 Mar 2019 #37
That's one of two ways. The other is just to hit "more" Hortensis Mar 2019 #39
Locking ... Yonnie3 Mar 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Is there an easier way to...»Reply #0