Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Is Joe Biden the new Ed Muskie? ... [View all]
https://www.salon.com/2019/08/31/is-joe-biden-the-new-ed-muskie-a-cautionary-tale-of-the-1972-frontrunner/Is Joe Biden the new Ed Muskie? A cautionary tale of the 1972 frontrunner
Democrats are beginning to reckon with the fact that, right now, the story of the 2020 election looks likely to end with Joe Biden being elected president.
That is very far from saying that Biden is a sure thing. Early frontrunners stand a pretty good chance of becoming a party's presidential nominee, as Hillary Clinton did four years ago. But Democrats can look to their own past for a legendary example of a frontrunner who was viewed as a consensus, "moderate" candidate and who went down in flames.
That happened in the tumultuous election of 1972, when Richard Nixon was running for re-election. He appeared beatable, thanks to a weakening economy, accusations of corruption (although the Watergate scandal hadn't begun to dominate the news) and continued civil unrest. On the other hand, Nixon had substantive foreign policy achievements: He was winding down the war in Vietnam and opening diplomacy with China, which would lead to his famous handshake with Mao Zedong.
During the year before the election, Sen. Edmund Muskie of Maine a laconic, inoffensive mainstream Democrat who had been Hubert Humphrey's running mate during the 1968 election led in most primary polls and tended to do well against Nixon in one-on-one matchups. Muskie was seen as acceptable to most factions of the Democratic Party, except the far left: He was liberal but not radical; he favored ending the war in Vietnam but was a staunch anti-Communist. His nomination seemed assured and a victory over Nixon was at least plausible. Much of the smart money in politics saw Muskie as the next president.
(more) https://www.salon.com/2019/08/31/is-joe-biden-the-new-ed-muskie-a-cautionary-tale-of-the-1972-frontrunner/
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Because Joe Biden is an empathetic, caring person in contrast to the total sociopath, Trump...
hlthe2b
Sep 2019
#1
This is no surprise coming from Salon, who went out of their way to propagate as many
still_one
Sep 2019
#6
That's funny- my perception was that Salon was decidedly pro-HRC and anti-Sanders
Fiendish Thingy
Sep 2019
#33
You have got to be joking; do a site search on salon.com for that time range
LongtimeAZDem
Sep 2019
#38
Actually Muskie was completely trashed by the media before the March 7 NH Primary when he called
still_one
Sep 2019
#15
Yes, he lost in a landslide, but one cannot ignore what was happening at the time. Nixon's dirty
still_one
Sep 2019
#16
At this point, anybody who doesn't vote for whoever has a D next to their name is an idiot.
vsrazdem
Sep 2019
#20
Lol, at least its not another gaffe thread Biden apologists have to twist into pretzels defending
Baclava
Sep 2019
#34
LOL! I'd say that's the most ridiculous comparison I've seen yet, but I just saw another
highplainsdem
Sep 2019
#42
The Democrats weren't going to win the 1972 election no matter who they nominated.
Drunken Irishman
Sep 2019
#48
Nobody is the new anybody and nothing is the new anything. Not this time.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Sep 2019
#49