Democratic Primaries

still_one

(98,883 posts)

15. Actually Muskie was completely trashed by the media before the March 7 NH Primary when he called

Sun Sep 1, 2019, 08:10 AM

Sep 2019

the publisher of the Union Leader Newspaper, William Loeb, a liar, and lambasting him for impugning the character of his wife.

That "cool, calm, image" was completely destroyed by the press, from the Washington Post, CBS News, to the Boston Globe, saying that Muskie broke down and cried.

The NY Times who was there, was one of the few outlets who could not confirm that.

That effectively did him in. It was viewed as a "sign of weakness" at the time

Nixon and his henchmen were actively doing their dirty tricks also. The cards were stacked against the Democrats from the get go, and no matter who our candidate was in 1972, it would have been very tough for Democrats to win. Nixon's Southern racist strategy was in full force then, and Wallace ran as a Democrat in the 1972 primaries on his segregationist, racist platform, which only helped Nixon's Southern Strategy

If Bobby Kennedy hadn't been taken from us in 1968, I think a lot of things would have been different

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is Joe Biden the new Ed Muskie? ... [View all] BooScout Sep 2019 OP

Because Joe Biden is an empathetic, caring person in contrast to the total sociopath, Trump... hlthe2b Sep 2019 #1

anything is possible.. samnsara Sep 2019 #2

Don't forget DownriverDem Sep 2019 #21

Agree, this article's a buncha malarky onetexan Sep 2019 #31

Muskie didn't get the nomination Cattledog Sep 2019 #3

Muskie did not have Biden's empathy, charisma and authenticity. nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #4

This is no surprise coming from Salon, who went out of their way to propagate as many still_one Sep 2019 #6

I looked up this writer and he has not been slanted OKNancy Sep 2019 #8

That may be, but after their distorted coverage toward Hillary in 2016, still_one Sep 2019 #10

I totally agree with you about what trash the once great Salon comradebillyboy Sep 2019 #39

We are exactly on the same page, including with HuffPost still_one Sep 2019 #40

In an era where 70+% only read the headlines NYMinute Sep 2019 #11

You are absolutely right NYMinute, and I am at fault for that also still_one Sep 2019 #17

No I don't... BooScout Sep 2019 #45

That's funny- my perception was that Salon was decidedly pro-HRC and anti-Sanders Fiendish Thingy Sep 2019 #33

You have got to be joking; do a site search on salon.com for that time range LongtimeAZDem Sep 2019 #38

Muskie couldn't have done worse than McGovern, my 1st presidential vote. elocs Sep 2019 #5

I don't think you read the whole article OKNancy Sep 2019 #7

Exactly. OP shoots self in foot. Cattledog Sep 2019 #12

Actually Muskie was completely trashed by the media before the March 7 NH Primary when he called still_one Sep 2019 #15

Hillary also led Obama by over 20 points in Nov. 2007 bigtree Sep 2019 #9

McGovern lost in a landslide... lost 49 states with just 39% of the vote. mr_liberal Sep 2019 #13

Yes, he lost in a landslide, but one cannot ignore what was happening at the time. Nixon's dirty still_one Sep 2019 #16

McGovern had to rescind his VP pick Otto Lidenbrock Sep 2019 #19

A better question --Is Warren the new McGovern? Always Randy Sep 2019 #14

I don't see the country getting excited about Warren Buckeyeblue Sep 2019 #18

Those are some of my reversations about Warren Ba2020 Sep 2019 #43

I agree that Biden is too old school Buckeyeblue Sep 2019 #44

Warren seems quite popular in the field delisen Sep 2019 #22

thank you for your response ---key word is apprhensive Always Randy Sep 2019 #24

I think Warren will do fine in the general election delisen Sep 2019 #51

A much better question. LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #26

This is more accurate, IMO LongtimeAZDem Sep 2019 #35

At this point, anybody who doesn't vote for whoever has a D next to their name is an idiot. vsrazdem Sep 2019 #20

This is a good time for the left wing to think about the 1972 election. yardwork Sep 2019 #23

All the dirty tricksters of today..... calguy Sep 2019 #28

They will rip ANY of our candidates if we let them. yardwork Sep 2019 #29

+ 1000 BooScout Sep 2019 #47

Thanks, Boo. yardwork Sep 2019 #54

There are so many articles that simply don't need to be written... LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #25

What's the point? paleotn Sep 2019 #27

Yeah, he is, and Trump is the new Eisenhower bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #30

Keep trying dear Warren acolytes. Polly Hennessey Sep 2019 #32

Lol, at least its not another gaffe thread Biden apologists have to twist into pretzels defending Baclava Sep 2019 #34

I remember the 1972 race well Gothmog Sep 2019 #36

"OTOH, Nixon had substantive foreign policy achievements." treestar Sep 2019 #37

I don't know. BlueWI Sep 2019 #41

LOL! I'd say that's the most ridiculous comparison I've seen yet, but I just saw another highplainsdem Sep 2019 #42

No. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #46

The Democrats weren't going to win the 1972 election no matter who they nominated. Drunken Irishman Sep 2019 #48

Nobody is the new anybody and nothing is the new anything. Not this time. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #49

I think you're right... myohmy2 Sep 2019 #50

bit of a difference between Nixon in 72 and Trump in 2020 qazplm135 Sep 2019 #52

Maybe in that... Mike Nelson Sep 2019 #53