Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

DrFunkenstein

(8,906 posts)
Tue Sep 3, 2019, 02:04 PM Sep 2019

Gen. Wesley Clark Was The Frontrunner At This Stage [View all]

There is no such thing as a "national primary." The early states will be key in terms of momentum, media narratives, and fundraising going into super Tuesday.

Keep in mind that in September 2003, Gen. Wesley Clark was the frontrunner, followed by Congressman Dick Gephardt in second place and Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and Sen. Joe Lieberman tied for third.

It was only at the end of February 2008 when Barack Obama finally pulled ahead of Clinton in voter choice among Democratic primary voters nationally after winning a number of post-Super Tuesday contests and pulling ahead in the delegate count.

The people around here that are suggesting this thing is done and dusted either have short memories or, more likely, would be quite happy if everything were actually done and dusted just as they stand today.

Wishing something was a foregone conclusion doesn't make it so.

But people have told Warren to give up before. Nevertheless, she persisted.

"Don't speak too soon
For the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who
That it's namin'"

-Bob Dylan

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No where near done Andy823 Sep 2019 #1
I don't think so frazzled Sep 2019 #2
The OP is incorrect. I was a DuClarkie in 03. BootinUp Sep 2019 #7
Besides DownriverDem Sep 2019 #11
Your opinion. Not everyone's. AtheistCrusader Sep 2019 #14
Ricidulous comparison. Clark was at 12% in the CBS Sept. 2004 poll and had just entered the race, highplainsdem Sep 2019 #3
Better comparison is Clinton 08 qazplm135 Sep 2019 #15
How About Clinton 45% and Obama 27% in DECEMBER 2007 DrFunkenstein Sep 2019 #17
Biden's numbers in Iowa are far stronger than Clinton's at this point. Drunken Irishman Sep 2019 #29
Found this from Gallup Docreed2003 Sep 2019 #4
Respectfully, I'm pretty sure you're wrong here. LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #5
Regardless of the topic. We cannot draw from anything before 2012, or so question everything Sep 2019 #6
My thread, based on RCP data, goes back to 2008 precisely for this reason (well that's as far back LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #8
So qazplm135 Sep 2019 #16
Five actually. And based upon the limited sample size, I'd rather be in the lead than anywhere else. LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #18
You since 2012 qazplm135 Sep 2019 #19
So you'd be just as happy in 5th place in single digits as you would in first place with almost 1/3 LincolnRossiter Sep 2019 #20
I wouldn't care because qazplm135 Sep 2019 #21
It's a whole new world out there now than it was in 2003. People are much more informed... George II Sep 2019 #9
Good reminder. I was a supporter, too, thinking he had the best chance to beat Bush. Still In Wisconsin Sep 2019 #10
Eventual Nominee JGug1 Sep 2019 #12
Interesting there are so many Clarkies here. elleng Sep 2019 #13
I was a Clarkie! UncleNoel Sep 2019 #22
Wes took someone's BAD advice to 'ignore' campaigning in Iowa, elleng Sep 2019 #23
Clark would have been better vp pick JI7 Sep 2019 #24
I was a Clarkie but he was out Raine Sep 2019 #25
Hillary True Blue American Sep 2019 #27
I would have loved True Blue American Sep 2019 #26
I was a big time Clarkie. BlueTsunami2018 Sep 2019 #28
+1 myohmy2 Sep 2019 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Gen. Wesley Clark Was The...»Reply #0