Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren endorses Texas U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar's Democratic primary challenger [View all]Blue_Adept
(6,499 posts)58. Warm bodies that vote against party interests. Yeah, that's what we needed.
Again, anti-abortion, anti-lgbt. Bright blue district. Why are we compromising?
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth Warren endorses Texas U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar's Democratic primary challenger [View all]
brooklynite
Sep 2019
OP
I haven't been able to find Warren's official statement, just that snippet in the Texas Tribune....
George II
Sep 2019
#1
A congressman has to vote for his constituency. A more "progressive" candidate has no chance....
George II
Sep 2019
#5
The point is can we elect someone better and the answer is no....he helps us retain our majority...
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#15
He was a co-founder but was forced out because of racial and misogynistic posts on Facebook.
George II
Sep 2019
#19
What is the point? It doesn't add to our numbers. And yeah a moderate GOP type might win...
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#12
He gets elected in his district. If Cisneros were to win the nomination (not a chance BTW)....
George II
Sep 2019
#21
Doesn't answer my question. If he votes with the republicans what is the difference if there is
vsrazdem
Sep 2019
#28
He votes with republicans about 30% of the time, whereas if Cisneros get the nomination...
George II
Sep 2019
#34
Regardless, he is part of the Democratic majority...40 of them are moderates to conservative...they
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#61
he voted with the Rethugs almost 70% of the time in the last full Congress (the 115th), not 30%
Celerity
Sep 2019
#83
It helps us retain the majority... you need warm bodies...that is the difference...geez.
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#49
If we don't have a majority than we bring nothing to the floor....yeah that is what we need...he can
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#60
I find primaries overrated...go after GOP seats and increase the majority in the house...stop
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#74
Again, if you think a district that voted 84% dem the last time is suddenly going to go republican
Blue_Adept
Sep 2019
#32
Yeah that is what they said in 2010 and (house) and 2012 (Senate) and it took us 10 years to win
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#16
They vote for this guy...if he was out of step why no primary before? I think it is foolish and risk
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#45
Realistically, in some states that is the best we can do...we don't have majorities in states houses
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#50
And in a district like this in Texas where we don't have to do that, we don't.
Blue_Adept
Sep 2019
#57
What makes you think this is a progressive district? I see no data supporting this assumption.
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#79
I find this wrong. Do not primary red state Democrats...it risks the seat...makes me question Sen.
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#10
I'm still looking for "official" word of this endorsement. All I've found is....
George II
Sep 2019
#22
Thanks. Wonder why it took so long since Justice Democrats started tweeting this mid-morning.
George II
Sep 2019
#71
it is a safe Democratic seat, regardless of TX overall being red and Cuellar is bad news on so many
Celerity
Sep 2019
#33
I understand it just fine...You don't understand that a +9 might not survive if we get a candidate
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#62
Cisneros would crush Whitten (who hasn't even lived in TX for 10 years) in the general nt
Celerity
Sep 2019
#70
A Democrat is always better, and if we keep the seat...fine. But I think it is a foolish risk this
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#73
Profoundly disagree, if you cannot draw the line at Cuellar and Lipinski, both with atrocious views
Celerity
Sep 2019
#75
Lipinski's disrict is not progressive...if you run one, the pugs could take the seat.
Demsrule86
Sep 2019
#78
False, Lipinski's seat, IL-3 is a completely safe Blue seat, and Newman is NOT some radical LW'er
Celerity
Sep 2019
#82
I am going to contribute to Cisneros's campaign and so hope she takes out Cuellar
Celerity
Sep 2019
#90
You are welcome to contribute to whomever you wish (as long as it's legal).
TexasTowelie
Sep 2019
#92
the type of voter who would support Cuellar over Cisneros was never going to vote for Warren anyway
Celerity
Sep 2019
#93
I doubt that any of the things you mentioned will make a difference to the voters in that district.
TexasTowelie
Sep 2019
#94
we are just going to have to fundamentally disagree, and unlike you I do NOT hold the voters
Celerity
Sep 2019
#95
If you were raised in that part of Texas like I was, then you would realize that my statement is
TexasTowelie
Sep 2019
#96
so glad to see this, highest Dem Trump score in the House last term, anti LGBTQ, pro-life, anti-
Celerity
Sep 2019
#25
as close as one can get. IF it was not a safe Dem seat, I would not advocate this, but
Celerity
Sep 2019
#31
Yet more reasons to support Cisneros, Cuellar's horrid on climate change, fossil fuels, & the NRA
Celerity
Sep 2019
#97
... by instead voting with Donald Trump nearly 70 percent of the time," said Danny Diaz, an activist
riversedge
Sep 2019
#53
If The DSCC Can Endorse Hickenlooper In The Senate Primacy, Warren Can Endorse Cisneros For House
corbettkroehler
Sep 2019
#55
I am rock solid in my beleiefs that we should not primary centrists in purple and red districts
Celerity
Sep 2019
#64