Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

JoeOtterbein

(7,878 posts)
Tue Sep 10, 2019, 12:35 AM Sep 2019

Why you shouldn't count out Bernie Sanders [View all]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/09/politics/bernie-sanders-polls/index.html

Analysis by Harry Enten, CNN

Updated 5:41 PM ET, Mon September 9, 2019

(CNN) Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders seems to be the third wheel among the Democratic frontrunners. Former Vice President Joe Biden has held a consistent advantage in national primary polls. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren seems to have the crowds and momentum.

Meanwhile, Sanders is often treated as 2016 leftovers.

I'm not sure what chance Sanders has of winning the nomination, but the national and early state polling suggest Sanders shouldn't be tossed aside as an afterthought. He remains a key player in this Democratic race.

Sanders is at 15% nationally in an average of debate qualifying polls over the last month. That may not seem like a lot, but it's actually very close to Warren's 18% average. Sanders actually runs slightly ahead of Warren in a number of polls, including one released by ABC News/Washington Post this past weekend, in which Sanders was at 19% and Warren was at 18%.

Importantly, Sanders isn't dropping. His 15% in national polls is what he's averaged basically all year with the exception of a post-announcement bump in March. Sanders is not like California Sen. Kamala Harris, who started in the single digits, rose after she announced, dropped, rose again after the first debate and then dropped a second time. Having 15% support is key because it means he's at the threshold to receive delegates in primary contests.


more at link
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Sanders has a ceiling and a floor. OilemFirchen Sep 2019 #1
Exactly. His base may be firmer than some other candidates, pnwmom Sep 2019 #2
I think some people confuse their own personal excitement and enthusiasm for a candidate with ehrnst Sep 2019 #10
Considering that he was considered a strong candidate in 2016 by some. LiberalFighter Sep 2019 #17
It all depends if it is a 2 person race Trenzalore Sep 2019 #37
ONLY if the two people are Biden and Sanders. OilemFirchen Sep 2019 #38
Is 15% a ceiling or a floor? crazytown Sep 2019 #3
Just another entry in the file. Optical.Catalyst Sep 2019 #4
"pet candidate" jcgoldie Sep 2019 #6
Projection maybe? nt BlueMississippi Sep 2019 #8
IKR sheshe2 Sep 2019 #36
So if we support someone other than Sanders it's only a "pet candidate"? That's insulting. George II Sep 2019 #11
Is it as insulting as telling fellow Democrats that voting for Sanders will cause us to lose? Optical.Catalyst Sep 2019 #15
More so. I don't support Sanders and have three or four possible choices, none are "pet candidates". George II Sep 2019 #16
Maybe they were not referring to you? Tiggeroshii Sep 2019 #27
It's not insulting if my analysis (and that of political pros) says the same thing... brooklynite Sep 2019 #19
Your analysis over rules my choice? Optical.Catalyst Sep 2019 #20
Straw man, anyone? ehrnst Sep 2019 #21
Who's denying you a choice? brooklynite Sep 2019 #22
I guess everyone has a right to their own, as you put it, "pet candidate". George II Sep 2019 #24
(Citation needed) Tiggeroshii Sep 2019 #28
It is much more insulting to accuse people who support other candidates pnwmom Sep 2019 #23
Absence of evidence makes both statements equally ridiculous. Tiggeroshii Sep 2019 #29
Saying anyone could lose isn't ridiculous. It's logically true. n/t pnwmom Sep 2019 #33
Saying anybody will* lose without evidence, is. Tiggeroshii Sep 2019 #35
Not at all. You're thinking about how the Intercept, Jacobin, Krystal Ball, CommonDreams, & TYT ehrnst Sep 2019 #13
Definitely not a fan of those groups. LiberalFighter Sep 2019 #18
Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #5
What do you mean? betsuni Sep 2019 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author NurseJackie Sep 2019 #12
We have to wait till super Tuesday to definitively count BS out. NYMinute Sep 2019 #9
Well, historically speaking..... (nt) ehrnst Sep 2019 #14
I hope I can "count on" ALL mathematically eliminated politicians to do the right thing. NurseJackie Sep 2019 #25
We have to wait till super tuesday to definitively count (insert candidate here) out. Tiggeroshii Sep 2019 #30
Sanders Fades In New Hampshire Gothmog Sep 2019 #26
Thx for posting!! Thekaspervote Sep 2019 #32
Why Bernie is stalled Gothmog Sep 2019 #31
Actually, I just don't Skidmore Sep 2019 #34
"I am not now, nor have I ever been, a liberal Democrat." Hortensis Sep 2019 #39
Yes, indeed. Skidmore Sep 2019 #40
:) Eye roll. 330 million people who need food, water, shelter every day Hortensis Sep 2019 #41
it is absolute arrogance to rule him out Otto Lidenbrock Sep 2019 #42
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Why you shouldn't count o...»Reply #0