Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Uncle Joe

(65,140 posts)
Wed Sep 18, 2019, 01:26 PM Sep 2019

How the GM workers strike makes Bernie Sanders's case for Medicare-for-all [View all]



(snip)

United Auto Workers at General Motors has long had what has been called the “gold standard” in union-negotiated health care plans: Workers pay little to nothing toward co-payments and deductibles, and each employee covers roughly 3 percent of the cost. For comparison, the average worker directly pays 28 percent of health care costs. It’s a benefit the union was able to largely keep intact through the auto industry crisis in 2009, and it has sacrificed wage and pension raises to maintain it. This is the kind of health care plan Biden is talking about when he warns about Medicare-for-all.

This argument is playing out in real time. Thousands of GM employees are on strike this week in a bid for better wages and benefits and to address concerns for temporary workers. GM dealt its employees’ union, the United Auto Workers, an incredible blow on Tuesday; Employees’ generous health care plan is being used as leverage to get workers to cross the picket line.

GM has cut off health benefits to striking employees, shifting the cost to the workers — and in turn the union. UAW has offered striking members COBRA health care, which allows them to continue medical and prescription drugs coverage, but it doesn’t include dental, vision, hearing, and accident insurance.

The company had essentially spelled out Sanders’s counterargument for him. As employers use health care costs as a negotiation tactic, this kind of thing is bound to happen more. And for Sanders, it’s the perfect case for doing away with the current system.

(snip)


https://www.vox.com/2019/9/18/20872116/general-motors-uaw-strike-medicare-for-all-biden-union

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is UAW ASKING for MfA? Or do their members want to hold on to their existing coverage? brooklynite Sep 2019 #1
Let's poll that picket line to start with! bluewater Sep 2019 #2
Can you promise that it would? brooklynite Sep 2019 #3
Why shouldn't it? bluewater Sep 2019 #4
ACA requires provision of medical coverage (if 50+ employees) to full-time workers under ACA... brooklynite Sep 2019 #6
The new law would though. bluewater Sep 2019 #7
That law doesn't exist right now and hasn't got enough comradebillyboy Sep 2019 #8
shrug neither does a public option, so let's all give up? bluewater Sep 2019 #9
but ACA does exist JI7 Sep 2019 #12
until the SCOTUS says it doesn't Celerity Sep 2019 #14
That won't even pass a committee -- and it has to pass 4 committees nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #20
Can you be certain that a Medicare for All Bill will prevail TexasTowelie Sep 2019 #26
I don't take my company insurance forthemiddle Sep 2019 #29
I am union Tennessee Tuxedo Sep 2019 #10
Interested. What insurance plan is that? nt fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #11
lol, you DO pay for it, it is called a vastly lower wage paid to you in the contract due to the fact Celerity Sep 2019 #13
Just as MFA is vastly lower take-home pay by increased taxes nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #19
Not that MFA is ever going to pass, but the overall net cost would Celerity Sep 2019 #23
"The cost would be lower" is MFA's illusion NYMinute Sep 2019 #24
there are multiple studies out there that show it does, compared to what we would spend Celerity Sep 2019 #28
+1000 nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #21
Unfortunately, due to the primacy of the shareholder doctrine, over the last several decades, PatrickforO Sep 2019 #30
The UAW has a $800 million dollar strike fund MichMan Sep 2019 #5
I doubt that would buy all members of the UAW even a years worth of insurance coverage. fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #17
The strike won't even last a few weeks nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #22
it sure does... myohmy2 Sep 2019 #15
"If you like your plan, you can keep it"* PDittie Sep 2019 #16
BS won't get any union votes because of this NYMinute Sep 2019 #18
That is making the case perfectly. The owners shouldn't have that kind of power over people's lives JudyM Sep 2019 #25
The counter-argument to that is TexasTowelie Sep 2019 #27
Health care should not be in the purview of an employer to "negotiate." JudyM Sep 2019 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»How the GM workers strike...»Reply #0