Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is UAW ASKING for MfA? Or do their members want to hold on to their existing coverage? brooklynite Sep 2019 #1
Let's poll that picket line to start with! bluewater Sep 2019 #2
Can you promise that it would? brooklynite Sep 2019 #3
Why shouldn't it? bluewater Sep 2019 #4
ACA requires provision of medical coverage (if 50+ employees) to full-time workers under ACA... brooklynite Sep 2019 #6
The new law would though. bluewater Sep 2019 #7
That law doesn't exist right now and hasn't got enough comradebillyboy Sep 2019 #8
shrug neither does a public option, so let's all give up? bluewater Sep 2019 #9
but ACA does exist JI7 Sep 2019 #12
until the SCOTUS says it doesn't Celerity Sep 2019 #14
That won't even pass a committee -- and it has to pass 4 committees nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #20
Can you be certain that a Medicare for All Bill will prevail TexasTowelie Sep 2019 #26
I don't take my company insurance forthemiddle Sep 2019 #29
I am union Tennessee Tuxedo Sep 2019 #10
Interested. What insurance plan is that? nt fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #11
lol, you DO pay for it, it is called a vastly lower wage paid to you in the contract due to the fact Celerity Sep 2019 #13
Just as MFA is vastly lower take-home pay by increased taxes nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #19
Not that MFA is ever going to pass, but the overall net cost would Celerity Sep 2019 #23
"The cost would be lower" is MFA's illusion NYMinute Sep 2019 #24
there are multiple studies out there that show it does, compared to what we would spend Celerity Sep 2019 #28
+1000 nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #21
Unfortunately, due to the primacy of the shareholder doctrine, over the last several decades, PatrickforO Sep 2019 #30
The UAW has a $800 million dollar strike fund MichMan Sep 2019 #5
I doubt that would buy all members of the UAW even a years worth of insurance coverage. fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #17
The strike won't even last a few weeks nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #22
it sure does... myohmy2 Sep 2019 #15
"If you like your plan, you can keep it"* PDittie Sep 2019 #16
BS won't get any union votes because of this NYMinute Sep 2019 #18
That is making the case perfectly. The owners shouldn't have that kind of power over people's lives JudyM Sep 2019 #25
The counter-argument to that is TexasTowelie Sep 2019 #27
Health care should not be in the purview of an employer to "negotiate." JudyM Sep 2019 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»How the GM workers strike...»Reply #21