Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

PatrickforO

(15,441 posts)
30. Unfortunately, due to the primacy of the shareholder doctrine, over the last several decades,
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 12:48 PM
Sep 2019

union membership has decreased significantly.

I'm fine with you keeping your union coverage - cool with me. But I want Medicare, because I have employer provided insurance in a non-union (actually anti-union) environment, and it is shitty, rationed healthcare with financially crippling copays.

That said, ANYONE who is elected will have to negotiate with both houses of Congress, and that negotiation will result in a compromise. Even though there is a lot of corporate money from big pharma and big health insurance lobbies lined up against even a public option, my guess, if we sweep in 2020 like I think we will, is that ACA will be fixed, including a strong individual mandate, mandatory coverage for pre-existing conditions, and high-deductible policies eliminated, as well as states being forced to expand Medicaid. AND a public option.

In our current corrupt situation, where those we elect ignore our interests and bow craven before corporate pressure and money, that's the best we'll get, I fear.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is UAW ASKING for MfA? Or do their members want to hold on to their existing coverage? brooklynite Sep 2019 #1
Let's poll that picket line to start with! bluewater Sep 2019 #2
Can you promise that it would? brooklynite Sep 2019 #3
Why shouldn't it? bluewater Sep 2019 #4
ACA requires provision of medical coverage (if 50+ employees) to full-time workers under ACA... brooklynite Sep 2019 #6
The new law would though. bluewater Sep 2019 #7
That law doesn't exist right now and hasn't got enough comradebillyboy Sep 2019 #8
shrug neither does a public option, so let's all give up? bluewater Sep 2019 #9
but ACA does exist JI7 Sep 2019 #12
until the SCOTUS says it doesn't Celerity Sep 2019 #14
That won't even pass a committee -- and it has to pass 4 committees nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #20
Can you be certain that a Medicare for All Bill will prevail TexasTowelie Sep 2019 #26
I don't take my company insurance forthemiddle Sep 2019 #29
I am union Tennessee Tuxedo Sep 2019 #10
Interested. What insurance plan is that? nt fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #11
lol, you DO pay for it, it is called a vastly lower wage paid to you in the contract due to the fact Celerity Sep 2019 #13
Just as MFA is vastly lower take-home pay by increased taxes nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #19
Not that MFA is ever going to pass, but the overall net cost would Celerity Sep 2019 #23
"The cost would be lower" is MFA's illusion NYMinute Sep 2019 #24
there are multiple studies out there that show it does, compared to what we would spend Celerity Sep 2019 #28
+1000 nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #21
Unfortunately, due to the primacy of the shareholder doctrine, over the last several decades, PatrickforO Sep 2019 #30
The UAW has a $800 million dollar strike fund MichMan Sep 2019 #5
I doubt that would buy all members of the UAW even a years worth of insurance coverage. fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #17
The strike won't even last a few weeks nt NYMinute Sep 2019 #22
it sure does... myohmy2 Sep 2019 #15
"If you like your plan, you can keep it"* PDittie Sep 2019 #16
BS won't get any union votes because of this NYMinute Sep 2019 #18
That is making the case perfectly. The owners shouldn't have that kind of power over people's lives JudyM Sep 2019 #25
The counter-argument to that is TexasTowelie Sep 2019 #27
Health care should not be in the purview of an employer to "negotiate." JudyM Sep 2019 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»How the GM workers strike...»Reply #30