Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

DrFunkenstein

(8,896 posts)
8. According to the US Departmental Ethics Office
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 05:46 AM
Sep 2019

Conflicts and Impartiality

Conflicting Financial Interests

Sometimes your government work may benefit you or your family personally, or may affect individuals or organizations that you have some connection with outside your government job. In these circumstances, the public could be concerned that you will be motivated by considerations other than your desire to do what is best for the public as a whole. Because the success of our government system depends upon maintaining the confidence of the public and your impartiality in performing official duties, your agency might decide that you should not be involved in a certain assignment because the public might question your objectivity.

Of course, the public is likely to consider some circumstances more troublesome than others. Recognizing this, Congress passed a criminal conflict of interest law, 18 U.S.C. § 208, which prohibits you from working on an assignment in some situations - even if you know you can be objective and even if your supervisor wants you to work on it.

Specifically, this law says that you may not work on an assignment that you know will affect your own financial interests or the financial interests of your spouse or your minor child. The prohibition also applies if you know the assignment will affect the financial interests of: your general partner; an organization that you serve as an officer, director, employee, general partner, or trustee; or someone with whom you have an arrangement for employment, or with whom you are negotiating for employment.

...

Appearance of Impartiality

There may be circumstances other than those covered by 18 U.S.C. § 208 in which an employee should not perform official duties in order to avoid an appearance of a loss of impartiality. The issue of impartiality is addressed in the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch at 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502. The regulation contains two disqualification provisions addressing appearance issues.

The first provision, entitled "Personal and business relationships," states that an employee should obtain specific authorization before participating in certain government matters where his or her impartiality is likely to be questioned. The matters covered by this standard are particular matters with specific parties, such as contracts, grants, or investigations:

--that are likely to affect the financial interests of a member of the employee's household, or

--In which persons with whom the employee has a specific relationship ("covered relationship" ) are parties or represent parties. This would include, for example, matters involving recent employers, employers of spouses or minor children, or anyone with whom the employee has or seeks a business or financial relationship.

https://www.doi.gov/ethics/conflicts

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author rampartc Sep 2019 #1
Impropriety? BlueTsunami2018 Sep 2019 #3
According to the US Departmental Ethics Office DrFunkenstein Sep 2019 #8
From the text you posted, one phrase jumped out at me: beastie boy Sep 2019 #13
That was brought up and answered at the time. Please don't aid RWers by echoing their attacks. highplainsdem Sep 2019 #18
You should re-read your own post PAMod Sep 2019 #22
If you talk about "Biden's impropriety," use that wording, you help the RW attacks on him. It's highplainsdem Sep 2019 #19
Prisons are full of lesser Donald Trump's. gordianot Sep 2019 #2
Here is my biggest concern. Funtatlaguy Sep 2019 #4
Bigger concerm, might be Dem progressives undermine Biden, who appears empedocles Sep 2019 #6
Then his base will be so pissed...we will have a landslide...they still love him...and the GOP is Demsrule86 Sep 2019 #15
Get real. Biden isn't and hasn't ended it. At most he is only peripherally involved at this point. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2019 #5
Hunter Biden did nothing wrong HeartlandProgressive Sep 2019 #9
yes he will! samnsara Sep 2019 #7
Joe Biden has been tRumps biggest fear. njhoneybadger Sep 2019 #10
Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #12
Can you follow up on this one? I am not getting it. beastie boy Sep 2019 #14
A couple three DU'ers seem to be amplifying Trump's false accusations for some unknown reason emulatorloo Sep 2019 #17
Yeah right jcgoldie Sep 2019 #11
You should be worried. bobGandolf Sep 2019 #16
It is strange peggysue2 Sep 2019 #20
President Trump was extraordinarily preoccupied with Joe Biden Gothmog Sep 2019 #21
I'm hopeful, but I'm not convinced that this damages tRump as much as we might hope. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2019 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»I always knew Joe Biden w...»Reply #8